Literature DB >> 6983817

Comparison of methods for determining exercise training intensity for cardiac patients and healthy adults.

M L Pollock, C Foster, J L Rod, G Wible.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6983817     DOI: 10.1159/000407132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Cardiol        ISSN: 0065-2326


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  The use of ratings of perceived exertion for exercise prescription in patients receiving beta-blocker therapy.

Authors:  R Eston; D Connolly
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Use of ratings of perceived exertion for predicting maximal work rate and prescribing exercise intensity in patients taking atenolol.

Authors:  R G Eston; M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  An Examination and Critique of Subjective Methods to Determine Exercise Intensity: The Talk Test, Feeling Scale, and Rating of Perceived Exertion.

Authors:  Daniel Bok; Marija Rakovac; Carl Foster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 11.928

4.  Face validity of the single work ability item: comparison with objectively measured heart rate reserve over several days.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Bjørn Søvsø Jensen; Karen Søgaard; Isabella Gomes Carneiro; Caroline Stordal Christiansen; Christiana Hanisch; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Workload Accomplished in Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Katrina L Schultz; Carl Foster; Kimberley Radtke; Susan Bramwell; Cristina Cortis; Andrea Fusco; John P Porcari
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2021-05-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.