Literature DB >> 6978506

Gill and lung ventilation responses to steady-state aquatic hypoxia and hyperoxia in the bullfrog tadpole.

N H West, W W Burggren.   

Abstract

Gill ventilation frequency (fG), the pressure amplitude (PBC) and stroke volume (VS) of buccal ventilation cycles, the frequency of air breaths (fL), water flow over the gills (VW), gill oxygen uptake (MGO2), oxygen utilization (U), and heart frequency (fH) have been measured in unanaesthetized, air breathing Rana catesbeiana tadpoles (stage XVI-XIX). The animals were unrestrained except for ECG leads or cannulae, and were able to surface voluntarily for air breathing. They were subjected to aquatic normoxia, hyperoxia and three levels of aquatic hypoxia, and their respiratory responses recorded in the steady state. The experiments were performed at 20 +/- 0.5 degrees C. In hyperoxia there was an absence of air breathing, and fG, PBC and VW fell from the normoxic values, while U increased, resulting in no significant change in MGO2. Animals in normoxia showed a very low fL which increased in progressively more hypoxic states. VW increased from the normoxic value in mild hypoxia (PO2 = 96 +/- 2 mm Hg), but fell, associated with a reduction in PBC, in moderate (PO2 = 41 +/- 1 mm Hg) and severe (PO2 = 21 +/- 3 mm Hg) hypoxia in the presence of lung ventilation. Gill MGO2 was not significantly different from the normoxic value in mild hypoxia but fell in moderate hypoxia, while in severe hypoxia oxygen was lost to the ventilating water from the blood perfusing the gills. There was no significant change in fH from the normoxic value in either hypoxia or hyperoxia. These data indicate, that in the bimodally breathing bullfrog tadpole, aquatic PO2 exerts a strong control over both gill and lung ventilation. Furthermore, there is an interaction between gill and lung ventilation such that the onset of a high frequency of lung ventilation in moderate and severe hypoxia promotes a suppression of gill ventilation cycles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6978506     DOI: 10.1016/0034-5687(82)90109-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Physiol        ISSN: 0034-5687


  8 in total

1.  Respiratory activity in the facial nucleus in an in vitro brainstem of tadpole, Rana catesbeiana.

Authors:  L Kubin; R J Galante; A P Fishman; A I Pack
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Time domains of the hypoxic ventilatory response in ectothermic vertebrates.

Authors:  Cosima Porteus; Michael S Hedrick; James W Hicks; Tobias Wang; William K Milsom
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Response of heart rate and cloacal ventilation in the bimodally respiring freshwater turtle, Rheodytes leukops, to experimental changes in aquatic PO2.

Authors:  Matthew A Gordos; Colin J Limpus; Craig E Franklin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Chronic nicotine and ethanol exposure both disrupt central ventilatory responses to hypoxia in bullfrog tadpoles.

Authors:  Barbara E Taylor; Cord M Brundage; Lisa H McLane
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 5.  Sensory innervation of the Gills: O2-sensitive chemoreceptors and mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  Mark L Burleson
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 6.  Development of central respiratory control in anurans: The role of neurochemicals in the emergence of air-breathing and the hypoxic response.

Authors:  Tara A Janes; Jean-Philippe Rousseau; Stéphanie Fournier; Elizabeth A Kiernan; Michael B Harris; Barbara E Taylor; Richard Kinkead
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 1.931

7.  Plasticity of lung development in the amphibian, Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Christopher S Rose; Brandon James
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Direct and indirect induction of a compensatory phenotype that alleviates the costs of an inducible defense.

Authors:  Tadashi Iwami; Osamu Kishida; Kinya Nishimura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.