Literature DB >> 6978339

The treatment of fibrous non-union of fractures by pulsing electromagnetic stimulation.

W J Sharrard, M L Sutcliffe, M J Robson, A G Maceachern.   

Abstract

Fifty-three ununited fractures with a median time since injury of 28 months were treated by electrical stimulation using pulsing electromagnetic fields. Union was achieved in 38 cases (71.7 per cent) in a median time of six months. For ununited fractures of the tibia the success rate was higher at 86.7 per cent. Previous or active sepsis, the presence of plates or nails, the age of the patient or the time since the injury did not affect the results. Analysis of the failures suggests that inadequate immobilisation, a fracture gap of more than five millimetres or the presence of a screw in the fracture gap was responsible. In four patients no cause of failure could be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6978339     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.64B2.6978339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  16 in total

1.  The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone cell metabolism and calvaria resorption in vitro, and on calcium metabolism in the live rat.

Authors:  S Yamada; H L Guenther; H Fleisch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields promote collagen production in bone marrow fibroblasts via athermal mechanisms.

Authors:  R W Farndale; J C Murray
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field and Combined Magnetic Field Exposure Time on Healing of a Rabbit Tibial Osteotomy.

Authors:  Douglas C Fredericks; Emily B Petersen; Madison Rhodes; Grace A Larew; James V Nepola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Effects of pulsing electromagnetic fields on cultured cartilage cells.

Authors:  A Sakai; K Suzuki; T Nakamura; T Norimura; T Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Radiodensitometric Assessment of the Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation Versus Low Intensity Laser Irradiation on Mandibular Fracture Repair: A Preliminary Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hamida Refai; Dalia Radwan; Nermeen Hassanien
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-07-26

7.  The effect of an intramedullary implant with a static magnetic field on the healing of the osteotomised rabbit femur.

Authors:  Nuri Aydin; Murat Bezer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparison of effects of MPTCP and PTCP ceramics implanted for the treatment of bone defects in rabbits.

Authors:  H Wu; T B Zhu; J Y Du; G X Hong; S Z Sun; X H Xu
Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ       Date:  1995

Review 9.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Aggelos Assiotis; Nick P Sachinis; Byron E Chalidis
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Pulsed electromagnetic stimulation in nonunion of tibial diaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Anil Kumar Gupta; Kailash Prasad Srivastava; Sachin Avasthi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.