Literature DB >> 6978120

Evaluation of various techniques to monitor intragastric pH.

D Meiners, S Clift, D Kaminski.   

Abstract

Recent reports emphasized the importance of maintenance of a high intragastric pH to prevent gastric mucosal bleeding in acutely ill patients. In this study gastric fluid pH determinations were compared with determinations obtained using an intragastric pH electrode. There was poor correlation between pH determinations obtained by a bare intragastric electrode in contact with the mucosa and pH determinations on fluid aspirated from the stomach. During cimetidine administration mucosal and fluid determinations correlated well, whereas during antacid administrations correlated well, whereas during antacid administration mucosal pH was significantly lower than gastric fluid pH. These results suggest that during antacid administration pH determinations on gastric contents with pH paper may not accurately reflect the pH at the mucosal surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6978120     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380270016004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  3 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of gastric acidity in intensive care patients: intermittent pH registration cannot replace continuous pH monitoring.

Authors:  M J Bonten; C A Gaillard; R W Stockbrügger; F H van Tiel; S van der Geest; E E Stobberingh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Intragastric pH measurement using a novel disposable sensor.

Authors:  M J Heath; J D Owen; S W Sanders; K G Tolman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Validation of the RightSpot™ device for determination of gastric pH during nasogastric tube placement.

Authors:  Charles R Lambert; David Varlotta; Marjorie Posey; Jadie L Heberlein; Janice M Shirley
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.