Literature DB >> 6974270

Aortic valve replacement in patients with poor ventricular function-early and late results with long-term follow-up.

K Matsui, J H Kay, M Mendez, P Zubiate, N Vanstrom, T Yokoyama, K Tokunaga.   

Abstract

A series of 62 consecutive patients with an ejection fraction of 0.4 or less (mean 0.28 with a range from 0.10 to 0.40; 22 between 0.10 and 0.20, 18 between 0.21 and 0.30, and 22 between 0.31 and 0.40) who underwent aortic valve replacement from January 18, 1972 to December 20, 1976 was reviewed. Preoperatively two patients were in Class II, 35 in Class III and 25 in Class IV of the New York Heart Association functional classification (N.Y.H.A.). Thirty-nine patients (Group 1) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement and 23 patients (Group 2) underwent aortic valve replacement with associated procedures including aortocoronary bypass in 15. The operative mortality was 8 percent in Group 1, 17 percent in Group 2, and 11 percent overall. In the group of 15 patients with coronary artery disease, the operative mortality of aortic valve replacement and aorto-coronary bypass was 27 percent. Since January 1974, isolated aortic valve replacement was performed with no operative deaths in 25 consecutive patients in Group 1 including 10 patients with an ejection fraction of 0.2 or less. Five-year survival rates were 70 percent in Group 1, 64 percent in Group 2 and 68 percent overall. In the 38 currently living patients, 32 showed clinical improvement and 27 are in Class I or II of N.Y.H.A. In conclusion, isolated aortic valve replacement can be performed with a low mortality and a high survival rate in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6974270     DOI: 10.1007/BF02468830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Surg        ISSN: 0047-1909


  20 in total

1.  The changing status of ejection fraction as a predictor of early mortality following surgery for acquired heart disease.

Authors:  G F Tyers; D R Williams; J D Babb; L Levenson; R F Zelis; J A Waldhausen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Left ventricular ejection fraction as a prognostic guide in surgical treatment of coronary and valvular heart disease.

Authors:  P F Cohn; R Gorlin; L H Cohn; J J Collins
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Factors influencing long-term survival after isolated aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  O W Isom; J M Dembrow; E Glassman; B S Pasternack; J P Sackler; F C Spencer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Dynamic geometry of the left ventricle in mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  P S Vokonas; R Gorlin; P F Cohn; M V Herman; E H Sonnenblick
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Progress study of 590 consecutive nonsurgical cases of coronary disease followed 5-9 years. II. Ventriculographic and other correlations.

Authors:  A V Bruschke; W L Proudfit; F M Sones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J Ross; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Left ventricular performance following correction of free aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  J H Gault; J W Covell; E Braunwald; J Ross
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Combined valvular and coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  G M Callard; J B Flege; J C Todd
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Valve replacement and myocardial revascularization. Results of combined operation in 59 patients.

Authors:  T J Berger; R B Karp; N T Kouchoukos
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Ball valve prostheses: current appraisal of late results.

Authors:  L I Bonchek; A Starr
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.