Literature DB >> 6974211

Experience with the sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a 13-year review.

R B MacIntosh.   

Abstract

This report surveys the experience in 236 patients operated on by the author, of whom 155 provided records complete enough to provide information on all the elements of postoperative evaluation. Patients were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. The patients had an average age of 23 years, and were predominantly female in a ratio of more than 4:1. No intraoperative or postoperative physiologically threatening problems as elsewhere described in the literature, such as profound blood loss, airway obstruction, or gross loss of bone substance, were encountered. An immediate postoperative paraesthesia incidence of almost 85% was observed, which diminished to 9% 1 year postoperatively. The prolonged paraesthesia were most common in patients over 40 years of age; similarly, healing was prolonged in patients over 40, prompting the author's recommendation that 8 weeks intermaxillary fixation rather than 6 be employed in these patients. The overall relapse rate was approximately 30%; this was clinically significant in approximately 12% of patients, and required reoperation in 4 patients. Relapse was most marked in apertognathic patients, demonstrating, in the author's opinion, that the sagittal ramus osteotomy should not be used, in general, in open-bite cases. The particulars of the technique and the author's views on regression are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6974211     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0503(81)80036-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0301-0503


  16 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors and prevention of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Belini Freire-Maia
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-08-12

2.  Skeletal Relapse After Mandibular Setback in Bi Max Surgery: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies.

Authors:  Ra'ed M A Al-Delayme; Moutaz Al-Khen
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-06

3.  A morphometric analysis of the mandibular canal by cone beam computed tomography and its relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Vinícius de Carvalho Machado; Björn Gjelvold
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

4.  Evaluation of neurosensory disturbance following orthognathic surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Saikrishna Degala; Sujeeth Kumar Shetty; M Bhanumathi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

5.  Neurosensory evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of mandible.

Authors:  P G Antony; Aneesh Sebastian; K George Varghese; C R Sobhana; S Mohan; C S Soumithran; Shiney Domnic; N Jayakumar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-03-20

6.  [Changes in the shape of the mandible by orthodontic surgical technics with stable fixation of the segments].

Authors:  H G Luhr; W Schauer; A Jäger; D Kubein-Meesenburg
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1986-01

7.  [The motivation and experiences of patients in connection with orthodontic-oral surgery combined therapy. A patient survey with consideration of the clinical and psychosocial factors].

Authors:  A Jäger; G Flechsig; H G Luhr
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-09

8.  Surgical management of mandibular condylar hyperplasia type 1.

Authors:  Larry M Wolford; Carlos A Morales-Ryan; Patricia García-Morales; Daniel Perez
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2009-10

9.  Three-dimensional evaluation of lingual split line after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in asymmetric prognathism.

Authors:  Jae Min Song; Yong Deok Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-02-25

Review 10.  Systematic review of preoperative mandibular canal position as it relates to postoperative neurosensory disturbance following the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  J Rich; B A Golden; C Phillips
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.789

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.