Literature DB >> 6971376

A rationale for the use of sequential coronary artery bypass grafts.

M J O'Neill, P D Wolf, T K O'Neill, R M Montesano, J A Waldhausen.   

Abstract

The use of sequential coronary artery bypass grafts has been advocated because of improved graft runoff and increased blood flow through the graft with this technique. To examine the influence of runoff, quantitated in terms of coronary vascular resistance, on the velocity of blood flow through coronary artery bypass grafts, we made two sets of simultaneous pressure and flow measurements in 106 single grafts and in 35 double sequential grafts. The first set of measurements was obtained following the aortic anastomosis and the second set of measurements was made following completion of the coronary anastomosis. Resistance of the coronary bed was calculated from the two sets of measurements. The velocity of blood flow through the grafts was calculated from vein graft diameter and the second flow measurement. No significant difference was found between the diameter of single vein grafts (4.0 +/- 0.05 mm.) and sequential vein grafts (4.1 +/- 0.09 nm.). Coronary vascular resistance in the sequential grafts (100.0 +/- 15.6 RU) was lower than that in single grafts (174.6 +/- 14.6 RU, p = 0.001). Velocity of blood flow through the proximal segment of the sequential grafts (11.1 +/- 1.1 cm/sec) was higher than that through single grafts (7.5 +/- 0.6 cm/sec, p = 0.003). The proximal segment of the sequential bypass graft has a higher velocity of blood flow than that seen in a single bypass graft. To obtain maximum hemodynamic advantage with the possibility of improving long-term patency rates, it is advisable to use the smaller coronary artery for the proximal sequential anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6971376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  10 in total

1.  Mechanical dilator for coronary and peripheral vascular surgery.

Authors:  A M Grande
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

2.  How serious is a proximal occlusion of a posterolateral sequential bypass?

Authors:  J T Christenson; M Schmuziger
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

3.  Computer-Aided Patient-Specific Coronary Artery Graft Design Improvements Using CFD Coupled Shape Optimizer.

Authors:  Onur Dur; Sinan Tolga Coskun; Kasim Oguz Coskun; David Frakes; Levent Burak Kara; Kerem Pekkan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.495

4.  Saphenous vein grafts with multiple versus single distal targets in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: one-year graft failure and five-year outcomes from the Project of Ex-Vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection (PREVENT) IV trial.

Authors:  Rajendra H Mehta; T Bruce Ferguson; Renato D Lopes; Gail E Hafley; Michael J Mack; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; C Michael Gibson; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf; Eric D Peterson; John H Alexander
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Double cobra head technique of distal coronary anastomosis.

Authors:  Vijayanand Palanisamy; Mithun Sundararaaja Ravikumar; Shilpa Shree; Antony Leander Sathiaraj; Anbarasu Mohanraj; Valikapthalil Mathew Kurian
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-09-28

6.  Effect of sequential coronary artery bypass venous grafting on right ventricular functions assessed by tissue Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  G Ozerdem; N Katrancioglu; B Candemir; E Saricam; O Ozturk; O Berkan
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.167

7.  Impacts of intraoperative flow on graft patency of sequential and individual saphenous vein grafts.

Authors:  Akitoshi Takazawa; Hiroyuki Nakajima; Atsushi Iguchi; Mimiko Tabata; Kozo Morita; Hiroyuki Koike; Kazuhiko Uwabe; Toshihisa Asakura; Hiroshi Niinami
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

8.  Sequential vein bypass grafting is not associated with an increase of either in-hospital or mid-term adverse events in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Fucheng Xiao; Jian Wang; Hengchao Wu; Hansong Sun
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Individual Versus Sequential Saphenous Vein Grafts for on-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - Does Smaller Coronaries in Indians Affect Graft Choice? - A Mid-Term Patency Comparison Study.

Authors:  Manoj M Joshi; Saptarshi Paul; Krishnarao N Bhosle; Suraj W Nagre; Hrishikesh Parashi; Manish Jadhao; Kunal Rawekar; Vignesh Ravikumar; Vishal Sawkar; Joshua A Selwyn
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-12-18

10.  Flow and wall shear stress in end-to-side and side-to-side anastomosis of venous coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  Thomas Frauenfelder; Evangelos Boutsianis; Thomas Schertler; Lars Husmann; Sebastian Leschka; Dimos Poulikakos; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.