Literature DB >> 6969878

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: a microneurographic and perceptual study.

M Janko, J V Trontelj.   

Abstract

With the aim of studying peripheral physiological mechanisms involved in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the suppression of pain, the authors have examined 14 healthy volunteers in the perceptual part and 8 in the microneurographic part of this study. For pain suppressing stimulation they have used ring electrodes and stimulators capable of producing rectangular, sine wave, triangular and hybrid wave forms. Pain was induced with electrical stimuli on the distal phalanx of the middle finger. TENS with rectangular, sine wave and triangular pulses activates mainly A beta, but also some A delta fibres. Pain suppressing capacity of different wave forms used was the same and was achieved with stimuli close to the threshold for pain. Pain was most effectively diminished when noxious and pain suppressing stimuli were applied to the same finger; this effect was smaller with the two stimuli on neighbouring fingers and very weak when pain suppressing stimulus was applied to the contralateral hand. Increases in stimulus frequency resulted in an increased and variable latency as well as intermittent blocking of those spike components which had been near threshold at low frequency stimulation. This interpreted as being due to local changes in excitation threshold. In surface-recorded averaged electroneurograms this effect was seen as amplitude decrement and increased response duration, but was not due to impulse transmission failure in A delta fibres as seen microneurographically. On continuous high frequency stimulation, the intensity of sensation elicited diminished, although there was no change in the microneurogram. The authors conclude that the peripheral contribution to the analgesic effects of TENS seems to be unimportant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6969878     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(80)90009-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  7 in total

1.  Thermal sensitivity is not changed by acute pain or afferent stimulation.

Authors:  A Ekblom; P Hansson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Spinal 5-HT(2) and 5-HT(3) receptors mediate low, but not high, frequency TENS-induced antihyperalgesia in rats.

Authors:  Rajan Radhakrishnan; Ellen W King; Janelle K Dickman; Carli A Herold; Natalie F Johnston; Megan L Spurgin; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Spinal muscarinic receptors are activated during low or high frequency TENS-induced antihyperalgesia in rats.

Authors:  R Radhakrishnan; K A Sluka
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Increasing intensity of TENS prevents analgesic tolerance in rats.

Authors:  Karina L Sato; Luciana S Sanada; Barbara A Rakel; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  High-frequency transcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation induces a higher increase of heat pain threshold in the cutaneous area of the stimulated nerve when confronted to the neighbouring areas.

Authors:  M Buonocore; N Camuzzini; M Cecini; E Dalla Toffola
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Preemptive Analgesic Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Eidy; Mohammad Reza Fazel; Monir Janzamini; Mostafa Haji Rezaei; Ali Reza Moravveji
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 7.  Remote Analgesic Effects Of Conventional Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation: A Scientific And Clinical Review With A Focus On Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Shai N Gozani
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.133

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.