Literature DB >> 6966689

Interaction between nerve-related acetylcholine and bath applied agonists at the frog end-plate.

A Feltz, A Trautmann.   

Abstract

1. The interaction between acetylcholine (ACh) and carbachol (CCh) has been studied at the frog end-plate. The conditioning agonist, CCh, can cause desensitization (reduction of the ACh test response) and potentiation (increase of the test response). 2. Nerve-evoked end-plate currents (e.p.c.s), minature e.p.c.s and "slow" responses to ACh ionophoresis can all be potentiated by bath or ionophoretically applied CCh. 3. Since potentiation was found to be particularly visible at low temperatures, most experiments were performed at 5-8 degrees C. Potentiation results in an increase of both e.p.c. amplitude and e.p.c. decay time. Potentiated e.p.c.s teminate with a slow tail, the amplitude of which shows a high voltage sensitivity. Potentiation increases with CCh concentration (range studied 0-100 microM). It appears to persist throughout the application of CCh, even when desensitization is apparently the dominant phenomenon. 4. It is suggested that cross-potentiation of ACh by CCh results from the formation of intermediate non-conducting CCh-receptor complexes which have a high probability of being subsequently activated by ACh, yielding a conducting ACh-CCh-receptor complex. 5. Desensitization induced by fast bath application of CCh (or ACh) develops in two phases and can be fitted by the sum of two exponentials. Their time constants are in the second and the minute range, respectively. 6. The possibility that the slow phase is linked to the presence of agonist inside the cell is rejected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6966689      PMCID: PMC1279241          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  35 in total

1.  Regulation of binding properties of the nicotinic receptor protein by cholinergic ligands in membrane fragments from Torpedo marmorata.

Authors:  M Weber; T David-Pfeuty; J P Changeux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The acetylcholine sensitivity in the vicinity of the neuromuscular junction of the frog.

Authors:  F Dreyer; K Peper
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1974-05-06       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  The desensitization of postjunctional muscle membrane after intracellular application of membrane stabilizers and snake venom polypeptides.

Authors:  F Vyskocil; L G Magazanik
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-12-24       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  On the mechanism of desensitization at cholinergic receptors.

Authors:  H P Rang; J M Ritter
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Decamethonium in depolarized muscle and the effects of tubocurarine.

Authors:  R Creese; J M England
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  An analysis of the action of a false transmitter at the neuromuscular junction.

Authors:  D Colquhoun; W A Large; H P Rang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Life time and elementary conductance of the channels mediating the excitatory effects of acetylcholine in Aplysia neurones.

Authors:  P Ascher; A Marty; T O Neild
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The maintenance of resting potentials in glycerol-treated muscle fibres.

Authors:  R S Eisenberg; J N Howell; P C Vaughan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cooperative interaction of glutamate and aspartate with receptors in the neuromuscular excitatory membrane in walking limbs of the lobster.

Authors:  R P Shank; A R Freeman
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1975-05

10.  Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction.

Authors:  C R Anderson; C F Stevens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  20 in total

1.  Single channels activated by acetylcholine in rat superior cervical ganglion.

Authors:  V A Derkach; R A North; A A Selyanko; V I Skok
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Acceleration of desensitization by agonist pre-treatment in the snake.

Authors:  J F Fiekers; D S Neel; R L Parsons
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The effect of repetitive neuromuscular activity on the sensitivity of acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  F Ruzzier; M Scuka
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Comparison of cholinergic activation and desensitization at snake twitch and slow muscle fibre end-plates.

Authors:  E A Connor; J F Fiekers; D S Neel; R L Parsons; R M Schnitzler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Structural models of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and its toxin-binding sites.

Authors:  H R Guy
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.046

6.  A molecular scheme for the reaction between acetylcholine and nicotinic channels.

Authors:  C Franke; H Parnas; G Hovav; J Dudel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Desensitization at the frog neuromuscular junction: a biphasic process.

Authors:  A Feltz; A Trautmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Properties of miniature postsynaptic currents during depolarization-induced release at a cholinergic neuroneuronal synapse.

Authors:  M Simonneau; L Tauc
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.046

9.  Influence of agonists on desensitization of glutamate receptors on locust muscle.

Authors:  N A Anis; R B Clark; K A Gration; P N Usherwood
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Interactions between three slow potassium responses controlled by three distinct receptors in Aplysia neurones.

Authors:  P Ascher; D Chesnoy-Marchais
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.