Literature DB >> 6965339

Prevalence of prior hysterectomy in the Seattle-Tacoma area.

T D Koepsell, N S Weiss, D J Thompson, D P Martin.   

Abstract

Hysterectomy is the most common major surgical procedure performed in the United States. The frequency of hysterectomy among women in the general population is of interest because it affects the population at risk for uterine diseases and because the procedure itself carries significant personal and socioeconomic consequences. We studied factors related to the occurrence of hysterectomy by interviewing a representative sample of women ages 35-74 (n= 1087) in two urban Washington counties during 1976-1977.One-third of the women studied had had a hysterectomy. Later birth cohorts were at higher risk. The ageadjusted prevalence of prior hysterectomy was negatively associated with education and age at first childbirth; it was positively associated with parity, history of irregular menses, and history of a variety of other health conditions. Contrary to expectation, income was negatively associated with hysterectomy rates in one county and showed no association in the other. Part of the income effect was due to confounding by age at first childbirth, which was a surprisingly strong predictive factor. WE CONCLUDE THAT: 1) despite economic predictions based on the discretionary nature of the procedure, hysterectomies are not necessarily more common among high-income women; 2) age at first childbirth may be a more important risk factor for uterine disease than previously thought; and 3) estimates of hysterectomy frequency based on clinic populations may be misleading. (Am J Public Health 70:40-47, 1980.)

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Developed Countries; Diseases; First Birth; Gynecologic Surgery; Health Services; Hysterectomy--statistics; Income; Maternal Age; North America; Northern America; Population Characteristics; Surgery; Treatment; United States; Urban Population; Urogenital Surgery; Washington

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6965339      PMCID: PMC1619330          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.70.1.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  17 in total

1.  GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY: ITS PROFILE.

Authors:  W W JACK; V N SLEE; P D HEADLY
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1964-05-15       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Socioeconomic factors affecting the utilization of surgical operations.

Authors:  C Bombardier; V R Fuchs; L A Lillard; K E Warner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effect of surveillance on the number of hysterectomies in the province of Saskatchewan.

Authors:  F J Dyck; F A Murphy; J K Murphy; D A Road; M S Boyd; E Osborne; D De Vlieger; B Korchinski; C Ripley; A T Bromley; P B Innes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Public-health rounds at the Harvard School of Public Health. Elective hysterectomy: pro and con.

Authors:  J P Bunker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The hospital care of patients undergoing hysterectomy: an analysis of 12,026 patients from the Professional Activity Study.

Authors:  W J Ledger; M A Child
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Small area variations in health care delivery.

Authors:  J Wennberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Rates of surgical care in prepaid group practices and the independent setting: what are the reasons for the differences?

Authors:  J P LoGerfo; R A Efird; P K Diehr; W C Richardson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Hysterectomy: from women to women.

Authors:  B C Richards
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The rising frequency of hysterectomy: its effect on uterine cancer rates.

Authors:  J L Lyon; J W Gardner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Elective hysterectomy.

Authors:  P Cole; J Berlin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-09-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  9 in total

1.  Hysterectomy and socioeconomic position in Rome, Italy.

Authors:  E Materia; L Rossi; T Spadea; L Cacciani; G Baglio; G Cesaroni; M Arcà; C A Perucci
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Socioeconomic variations in hysterectomy: evidence from a linkage study of the Finnish hospital discharge register and population census.

Authors:  R Luoto; I Keskimäki; A Reunanen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Negative attitudes and affect do not predict elective hysterectomy: a prospective analysis from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Carolyn J Gibson; Joyce T Bromberger; Gerson E Weiss; Rebecca C Thurston; MaryFran Sowers; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Hysterectomy use: the correspondence between self-reports and hospital records.

Authors:  K M Brett; J H Madans
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  A case-control investigation of adenomyosis: impact of control group selection on risk factor strength.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Noel S Weiss; Carole B Rudra; Delia Scholes; Victoria L Holt
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-01-26

6.  A prospective study of hypertension and risk of uterine leiomyomata.

Authors:  Renée Boynton-Jarrett; Janet Rich-Edwards; Susan Malspeis; Stacey A Missmer; Rosalind Wright
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  Age at Menarche, Level of Education, Parity and the Risk of Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Population-Based Observational Studies.

Authors:  Louise F Wilson; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The epidemiological profile of hysterectomy in rural Chinese women: a population-based study.

Authors:  Fangfang Liu; Yaqi Pan; Yongmei Liang; Chaoting Zhang; Qiuju Deng; Xiang Li; Mengfei Liu; Zhonghu He; Ying Liu; Jingjing Li; Tao Ning; Chuanhai Guo; Ruiping Xu; Lixin Zhang; Hong Cai; Yang Ke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Timing of menarche, childbearing and hysterectomy risk.

Authors:  Rachel Cooper; Rebecca Hardy; Diana Kuh
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.342

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.