Literature DB >> 6961809

Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction.

F D Lo, W S Hunter.   

Abstract

Changes in the nasolabial angle of the soft-tissue profile were assessed quantitatively in a serial cephalometric study of fifty treated subjects and forty-three untreated subjects, all of whom had Class II, Division 1 malocclusions. Correlations, simple and multiple regression analyses, and multifactorial analysis of variance were used to examine the changes in the nasolabial angle owing to incisor superius retraction and associated skeletal displacements. There were no significant changes in nasolabial angle because of growth. However, the greater the maxillary incisor retraction, the greater was the increase in nasolabial angle. Increase in the nasolabial angle showed a significant correlation with treatment-related increase in the vertical dimension of the lower face. The soft-tissue profile followed closely the underlying skeletal framework. Extraction and nonextraction treatment procedures did not show significant differences in the changes of the nasolabial angle. Results permit prediction of the changes in nasolabial angle owing to incisor superius retraction in orthodontic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6961809     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90187-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  7 in total

1.  [Incisor position and soft tissue profile--an experimental study].

Authors:  L Speth; H G Sergl; K Fuhr
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1984-10

2.  [Significance of the anterior nasal spine in the mid-face profile].

Authors:  E A Holtgrave
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1984-02

3.  Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison.

Authors:  Johan Willem Booij; Juliane Goeke; Ewald Maria Bronkhorst; Christos Katsaros; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Evaluation of the nasolabial angle in the Indian population.

Authors:  Vinay Dua; Shilpa Gupta; Chanjyot Singh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2010-04

5.  Pleasantness of facial profile and its correlation with soft tissue cephalometric parameters: Perception of orthodontists and lay people.

Authors:  Geraldo Eugênio Marchiori; Leonardo Oliveira Sodré; Tereza Cristina Rodrigues da Cunha; Fernando César Torres; Henrique Damian Rosário; Luiz Renato Paranhos
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

6.  Prediction of lip response to orthodontic treatment using a multivariable regression model.

Authors:  Amin Shirvani; Saeid Sadeghian; Safieh Abbasi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

7.  Nasal Morphology and Its Correlation to Craniofacial Morphology in Lateral Cephalometric Analysis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Jankowska; Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.