Literature DB >> 6957576

Maximal bite force with centric and eccentric load.

S E Widmalm, S G Ericsson.   

Abstract

Premolar bite force was measured conventionally with a pressure transducer. During biting the tips of the buccal cusps made contact with the transducer. It was shown that the maximal bite force increased significantly if the eccentric load on the upper premolar was made centric and axial with respect to the transducer by covering the whole occlusal surface of the tooth with a plastic filling. Possible neurophysiological explanations of the difference in bite force are discussed. It is concluded that biting on a pressure transducer with an eccentric load cannot give a fair estimation of the true value of the maximal bite force during clenching in the position of intercuspidation.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6957576     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1982.tb01034.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  7 in total

1.  [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of cuspal-coverage thickness influence on the stress distribution of all-ceramic onlay-restored premolars].

Authors:  Ya-Hu She; Yi-Yi Zhang; Yu-Xuan Liu; Chang-Yun Fang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-01

2.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Different Positions.

Authors:  Elmira Jafari Navimipour; Mohammad Esmaeel Ebrahimi Chaharom; Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee; Narmin Mohammadi; Mahmoud Bahari; Maryam Firouzmandi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2012-11-12

3.  Biomechanical interactions of endodontically treated tooth implant-supported prosthesis under fatigue test with acoustic emission monitoring.

Authors:  Shao-Fu Huang; Wan-Rung Chen; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Comparison of CAD/CAM abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal type implant after cyclic loading: Axial displacement, removal torque, and tensile removal force.

Authors:  Yuseung Yi; Seong-Joo Heo; Jai-Young Koak; Seong-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Examination of ceramic restoration adhesive coverage in cusp-replacement premolar using acoustic emission under fatigue testing.

Authors:  Yen-Hsiang Chang; Jin-Jie Yu; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  A finite element study to determine the occurrence of abfraction and displacement due to various occlusal forces and with different alveolar bone height.

Authors:  Kharidhi Laxman Vandana; Mittal Deepti; Muneer Shaimaa; Karnath Naveen; Desai Rajendra
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

7.  Effect of Endocrown Restorations with Different CAD/CAM Materials: 3D Finite Element and Weibull Analyses.

Authors:  Laden Gulec; Nuran Ulusoy
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.