Literature DB >> 6957451

Computer comparison of bitemark patterns in identical twins.

R F Sognnaes, R D Rawson, B M Gratt, N B Nguyen.   

Abstract

Individual dental patterns have been explored by direct comparison of test bites from several sets of young adult monozygotic twins. For this purpose, epoxy models from the dentition of each twin were used for experimental tooth indentations and converted to radiographic contact profiles. These sharply outlined radiographic bitemark patterns were then subjected to a computerized comparison, involving electronic storage and correlations. Despite similar developmental morphology of individual teeth, there were significant variations between the twins in each pair with respect to the individual arrangements of the anterior teeth in the dental arch; the teeth had distinctly different rotations, sometimes reflecting a mirror image of the twin-pair bitemark patterns. Thus, the computer comparison made it clear that in terms of occlusal arch form and individual tooth positions, even so-called identical twins are in fact not dentally identical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6957451     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1982.0338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  8 in total

Review 1.  The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology.

Authors:  Ademir Franco; Guy Willems; Paulo Henrique Couto Souza; Geertruida E Bekkering; Patrick Thevissen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Three-dimensional palatal anatomic characteristics' correlation with dermatoglyphic heterogeneity in Angle malocclusions.

Authors:  Ibrahim AlShahrani; Ali A Dawasaz; Sadatullah Syed; Mohammed Ibrahim; Rafi A Togoo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Three-dimensional validation of the impact of the quantity of teeth or tooth parts on the morphological difference between twin dentitions.

Authors:  A Franco; G Willems; P H Couto Souza; W Coucke; P Thevissen
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2016-07-01

4.  [X-ray study of differences in the position of the mandible in twins].

Authors:  V Lapter; Z Muretić
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1985-06

Review 5.  Identification of a person with the help of bite mark analysis.

Authors:  Anoop K Verma; Sachil Kumar; Sandeep Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2013-06-10

6.  A comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation.

Authors:  Pallavi Raina; Narayan Kulkarni; Romil Shah
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2020-06-03

Review 7.  Dentistry to the rescue of missing children: A review.

Authors:  Nitika Vij; Gulsheen Kaur Kochhar; Sanjay Chachra; Taranjot Kaur
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

8.  The genetic basis of facial skeletal characteristics and its relation with orthodontics.

Authors:  Derya Germec Cakan; Feyza Ulkur; Tulin Uğur Taner
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.