Literature DB >> 6951180

Comparison of acetylcholine receptor-controlled cation flux in membrane vesicles from Torpedo californica and Electrophorus electricus: chemical kinetic measurements in the millisecond region.

G P Hess, E B Pasquale, J W Walker, M G McNamee.   

Abstract

In earlier studies with the acetylcholine receptor (AcChoR) of Electrophorus electricus the rate and equilibrium constants for a model that relates the ligand binding to ion translocation were determined, and the dependence of these constants on the concentrations of carbamoylcholine and acetylcholine, over a 200- and 5000-fold range, respectively, could be predicted. AcChoR-controlled cation flux has now been measured in Torpedo californica vesicles by using a pulsed-quench-flow technique with a 2-msec time resolution. Torpedo vesicles on a weight basis may contain several hundred times more receptor sites than do E. electricus vesicles. Techniques have been developed to (i) correct for the kinetic heterogeneity of the vesicle population; (ii) use the inactivation of the receptor by its natural ligand to reduce influx rates at high ligand concentrations to a measurable level (this permitted J(A), the influx rate coefficient before the onset of inactivation, to be measured); and (iii) determine the rate coefficients of two processes that lead to successive inactivations (desensitization) of the receptor and occur in different time regions. An extension of a model proposed for the E. electricus receptor accommodates the ion translocation in T. californica vesicles. The features in common are: (i) A rapid initial flux rate [J(A)(max) for T. californica is 310 sec(-1); for E. electricus it is 7.5 sec(-1)]. These differences in flux rates are consistent with a difference in AcChoR density. (ii) A rapid inactivation process [alpha(max) for T. californica is 2 sec(-1); for E. electricus it is 7 sec(-1)]. (iii) A slow AcChoR-controlled flux that continues after the rapid inactivation [J(I)(max) for T. californica is 1.3 sec(-1); for E. electricus it is 0.015 sec(-1)]. The main difference between the flux in the two types of vesicle is the existence of a second, slower, inactivation process in T. californica with a rate coefficient, beta, of 0.12 sec(-1). The second process leads to undetectable flux activity during the time of observation (30 sec in 10 mM carbamoylcholine). These studies are also significant because fundamental differences may exist between the mechanism of AcChoR-controlled ion flux in synaptic (Torpedo) and conducting (E. electricus) membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6951180      PMCID: PMC345879          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.4.963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Demonstration of two reaction pathways for the aminoacylation of tRNA. Application of the pulsed quenched flow technique.

Authors:  A R Fersht; R Jakes
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1975-07-29       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  On the excitability and cooperativity of the electroplax membrane.

Authors:  J P Changeux; T R Podleski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Direct spectroscopic studies of cation translocation by Torpedo acetylcholine receptor on a time scale of physiological relevance.

Authors:  H P Moore; M A Raftery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Acetylcholine receptor-controlled ion flux in electroplax membrane vesicles: a minimal mechanism based on rate measurements in the millisecond to minute time region.

Authors:  H Aoshima; D J Cash; G P Hess
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1980-02-12       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Quenched flow technique with plasma membrane vesicles: acetylcholine receptor-mediated transmembrane ion flux.

Authors:  D J Cash; G P Hess
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1981-03-15       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Mechanism of inactivation (desensitization) of acetylcholine receptor. Investigations by fast reaction techniques with membrane vesicles.

Authors:  H Aoshima; D J Cash; G P Hess
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1981-06-09       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Permeability control by cholinergic receptors in Torpedo postsynaptic membranes: agonist dose-response relations measured at second and millisecond times.

Authors:  R R Neubig; J B Cohen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1980-06-10       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Molecular mechanism of acetylcholine receptor-controlled ion translocation across cell membranes.

Authors:  D J Cash; G P Hess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Single acetylcholine-activated channels show burst-kinetics in presence of desensitizing concentrations of agonist.

Authors:  B Sakmann; J Patlak; E Neher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-07-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Independent activation of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica at two sites.

Authors:  A M Delegeane; M G McNamee
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1980-03-04       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Desensitization of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: molecular mechanisms and effect of modulators.

Authors:  E L Ochoa; A Chattopadhyay; M G McNamee
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.046

2.  Acetylcholine receptor: dynamic properties.

Authors:  D J Cash; G P Hess
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by protein phosphorylation.

Authors:  K Miles; R L Huganir
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Transmembrane flux and receptor desensitization measured with membrane vesicles. Homogeneity of vesicles investigated by computer simulation.

Authors:  D J Cash; R M Langer; K Subbarao; J R Bradbury
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  High acetylcholine concentrations cause rapid inactivation before fast desensitization in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors from Torpedo.

Authors:  S A Forman; K W Miller
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Acetylcholine receptor kinetics: chemical kinetics.

Authors:  J B Udgaonkar; G P Hess
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Cocaine and phencyclidine inhibition of the acetylcholine receptor: analysis of the mechanisms of action based on measurements of ion flux in the millisecond-to-minute time region.

Authors:  J W Karpen; H Aoshima; L G Abood; G P Hess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Subunit structure of the acetylcholine receptor from Electrophorus electricus.

Authors:  B M Conti-Tronconi; M W Hunkapiller; J M Lindstrom; M A Raftery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Single-channel current recordings of acetylcholine receptors in electroplax isolated from the Electrophorus electricus Main and Sachs' electric organs.

Authors:  E B Pasquale; J B Udgaonkar; G P Hess
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.843

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.