Literature DB >> 6947693

Orthodontic cooperation.

N H El-Mangoury.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present article was to provide a reasonably coherent picture of the concept as well as the prediction of the misunderstood phenomenon of orthodontic cooperation. A sample of seventy orthodontic patients was studied. A double-blind quasi-experimental research design was performed. Psychological instruments were used in order to measure achievement, affiliation, and attribution motivation. The following dependent variables were recorded: headgear wear, elastic wear, appliance maintenance, nonbroken appointments, oral hygiene, and plaque index. The raw data were analyzed by three different techniques. The results obtained from this study indicate that orthodontic cooperation is predictable through psychological testing. Specifically, high-need achievers cooperate better orthodontically than low-need affiliators, and internals cooperate better orthodontically than externals. Further, it was found that orthodontic cooperation does not involve a simple single general dimension of cooperation. Rather, orthodontic cooperation is composed of a more complex structure of two orthogonal constructs: Specific Orthodontics Construct of Cooperation (SOCC) and Perio-Orthodontic Construct of Cooperation (POCC). Because SOCC and POCC are orthogonal, a patient who is a good brusher does not have to be a good headgear wearer, and vice versa. The relative contribution of motivational psychology on each of the variables constituting orthodontic cooperation was determined. The implications for clinical applications were presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6947693     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90264-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  9 in total

1.  Cooperation of adolescents in orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  J E Albino; S D Lawrence; C E Lopes; L B Nash; L A Tedesco
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1991-02

2.  Development and validation of a scale measuring the locus of control orientation in relation to socio-dental effects.

Authors:  S Acharya; K C Pentapati; D K Singhal; A S Thakur
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-11-04

3.  [Attitude of adolescents to their orthodontic treatment].

Authors:  G Huppmann; R Koch; E Witt
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1986-04

4.  Treatment of Class III malocclusion using miniscrew-anchored inverted Forsus FRD: Controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Osama Eissa; Mahmoud ElShennawy; Safaa Gaballah; Ghada ElMehy; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  [The clinical and psychological indicators of behavior in wearing a removable appliance].

Authors:  A Bartsch; E Witt; I Dietz; P Dietz
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1993-06

6.  Personality traits as a potential predictor of willingness to undergo various orthodontic treatments.

Authors:  Vincent Hansen; Sean Shih-Yao Liu; Stuart M Schrader; Jeffery A Dean; Kelton T Stewart
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Effects of procedures of remineralization around orthodontics bracket bonded by self-etching primer on its shear bond strength.

Authors:  Mahmoud Al-Suleiman; Nick Silikas; David Watts
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2012-07

8.  Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ahmad Sharafeddin Burhan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciatore; Lisa Alvetro; Efisio Defraia; Luis Tomas Huanc Ghislanzoni; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.