Literature DB >> 6946884

Frequency and distribution of proximal overlappings on posterior bitewing radiographs.

I Sewerin.   

Abstract

4374 proximal surfaces on 791 posterior bitewing radiographs were classified according to overlappings. Six categories were used: 1) no overlapping, 2) blurred contact areas, 3) less than half of the enamel overlapped, 4) more than half of the enamel overlapped, 5) dentin overlapped, and 6) unclassifiable overlappings. Filled surfaces and surfaces not in contact were excluded. Only 19% of the surfaces did not have overlappings 65% exhibited mild overlappings (categories 2 and 3), and 16% severe overlappings (categories 4, 5 and 6). The frequencies of no overlappings varied from 7% to 40% for single tooth surfaces. The relationship between distribution of overlappings and tooth surfaces was statistically significant at the 0.05% level. Principles of excluding overlapping surfaces have been inconsistent in previous epidemiologic studies and clinical trials. The use of exact criteria for exclusion is recommended.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6946884     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1981.tb01031.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  2 in total

1.  Quality of bitewing radiographs in children in relation to the type of film holder used.

Authors:  H D Herman; M Ashkenazi
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-04-18

2.  The role of stationary intraoral tomosynthesis in reducing proximal overlap in bitewing radiography.

Authors:  Sally M Mauriello; Angela M Broome; Enrique Platin; André Mol; Christina Inscoe; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Kevin Moss
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.419

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.