Literature DB >> 6935981

Racial differences in dimensional traits of the human face.

E R Richardson.   

Abstract

1. Race is difficult to define at best and references to groups are more accurately made on the basis of ethnic groups that are bound by some common bond, such as Swedish Whites, American Whites, etc. 2. The quantifiable differences in the somatic craniofacial region of ethnic groups residing for several generations in the same or similar geographic areas are small. 3. The evidence supports a geographical effect on the most frequently used quantifiable angular measurements of the somatic facial profile of the major racial groups. 4. Cephalofacial morphology is affected by many factors including genetics, function and temperature. 5. There are mean differences in the quantifiable traits of the face of some ethnic groups. The differences in means within ethnic or racial groups are often greater than the differences in means among ethnic or racial groups. 6. The differences in means of traits of the somatic facial skeleton among or between ethnic groups are usually very small with an enormous degree of overlap. 7. The parameters of the face that are closer to the alveolar and dental areas show the greatest differences among ethnic and racial groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6935981     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1980)050<0301:RDIDTO>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  11 in total

1.  [A comparative study of the craniofacial morphology of 2 ethnic groups].

Authors:  Z Muretić; E Apeldorn; V Lapter; H G Sergl
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1990-04

Review 2.  Gene/environment interactions in craniosynostosis: A brief review.

Authors:  E L Durham; R N Howie; J J Cray
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  The Polish face in profile: a cephalometric baseline study.

Authors:  Jolanta E Loster; Stephen Williams; Aneta Wieczorek; Bartłomiej W Loster
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery for North Indian population.

Authors:  Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Utreja; Ashok Kumar Jena
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-10

5.  Craniofacial characteristics of Caucasian and Afro-Caucasian Brazilian subjects with normal occlusion.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Camila Leite Quaglio; Arnaldo Pinzan; Eduardo Jacomino Franco; Marcos Roberto de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Disparity in opinions on lip protrusiveness in contemporary African American faces.

Authors:  Yvette Battle; Monica Schneider; Laurence Magder; Eung-Kwon Pae
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  A comparison of skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue characteristics in white and black Brazilian subjects.

Authors:  Lívia Maria Andrade de Freitas; Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Arnaldo Pinzan; Guilherme Janson; Marcos Roberto de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents.

Authors:  Ahmad Mohammad Hamdan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Analysis of dynamic smile and upper lip curvature in young Chinese.

Authors:  Ling-Zhi Liang; Wen-Jie Hu; Yan-Ling Zhang; Kwok-Hung Chung
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 6.344

10.  Automatic landmark annotation and dense correspondence registration for 3D human facial images.

Authors:  Jianya Guo; Xi Mei; Kun Tang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.