Literature DB >> 6931505

Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography: compensation tables for linear measurements.

E O Bergersen.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6931505     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1980)050<0230:EADICR>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


× No keyword cloud information.
  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.

Authors:  S Varghese; V Kailasam; S Padmanabhan; B Vikraman; A Chithranjan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Effects of head positioning on cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  M Berneburg; B Koos; R Kratochwil; A Godt
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparison of linear measurements between CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms and conventional cephalograms.

Authors:  S Yang; D G Liu; Y Gu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Maxillofacial characteristics affecting chin deviation between mandibular retrusion and prognathism patients.

Authors:  Eun-Jeong Kim; J Martin Palomo; Seong-Sik Kim; Hoi-Jeong Lim; Kyung-Min Lee; Hyeon-Shik Hwang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Evaluation of two stereophotogrametry software for 3D reconstruction of virtual facial models.

Authors:  Lorena Basilio Chaves; Taliane Lima Barbosa; Caroline Pelagio Maués Casagrande; David Silveira Alencar; Jonas Capelli; Felipe de Assis Ribeiro Carvalho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-07-04

6.  Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.

Authors:  John B Ludlow; Maritzabel Gubler; Lucia Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Frankfort horizontal plane is an appropriate three-dimensinal reference in the evaluation of clinical and skeletal cant.

Authors:  Suseok Oh; Jaemyung Ahn; Ki-Uk Nam; Jun-Young Paeng; Jongrak Hong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-04-23

8.  Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Nikolaos Topouzelis
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-17

9.  Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Metin Nur; Saadettin Kayipmaz; Mehmet Bayram; Mevlut Celikoglu; Dogan Kilkis; Omer Said Sezgin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Lower Facial Asymmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Non-Cleft Patients with Class III Skeletal Relationship.

Authors:  Yifan Lin; Gui Chen; Zhen Fu; Lian Ma; Weiran Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.