Literature DB >> 6931484

Biomechanical and clinical considerations of a modified protraction headgear.

R Nanda.   

Abstract

The choice of treatment of children with developing skeletal Class III malocclusions has always posed a dilemma. Chin cups and various types of reverse headgears with elastics have been used in the past to minimize the growth and development discrepancy of the midface and the mandibular bones. In the present article, a critique of commonly used protraction devices is presented. A modified protraction headgear design and the biomechanical considerations of its clinical use are presented in this study. The clinical results show that a modified protraction headgear with a chin cup helps in the correction of moderately severe Class III malocclusions by the anterior displacement of the maxilla and maxillary dentition, and possibly restricting or changing the direction of the growth of the mandible. This headgear can also be used to correct axial inclinations and/or mesial displacement of posterior teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6931484     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90055-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  12 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Alternative treatment for open bite Class III malocclusion in a child with Williams-Beuren syndrome.

Authors:  Giovanni Modesto Vieira; Eduardo Jacomino Franco; Denise Falcão Pinheiro da Rocha; Laudimar Alves de Oliveira; Rivadávio Fernandes Batista Amorim
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

3.  A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes of mild skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew for anchorage in growing patients: A single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Masahiro Seiryu; Hiroto Ida; Atsushi Mayama; Satoshi Sasaki; Shutaro Sasaki; Toru Deguchi; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effects of Modified Jasper Jumper Appliance and Delaire Face Mask with Pancherz Analysis.

Authors:  Hülya Kılıçoğlu; Nilüfer Yılmaz Öğütlü; Ceylan Alioğlu Uludağ
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-03-01

5.  Sutural deformation during bone-anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Taylor Rae Vracar; Wanda Claro; Michael Eli Vracar; Randall Stetson Jenkins; Lane Bland; Ayman Al Dayeh
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-05-21

6.  Expansion/Facemask Treatment of an Adult Class III Malocclusion.

Authors:  Gregory W Jackson; Neal D Kravitz
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-02-19

7.  The Effects of Maxillary Protraction with or without Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Age Factors in Treating Class III Malocclusion: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Hong-Chen Qu; Mo Yu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Li Zheng; Qiang Wang; Li Lu; Jia Ma
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.

Authors:  Peter Ngan; Benedict Wilmes; Dieter Drescher; Chris Martin; Bryan Weaver; Erdogan Gunel
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Management of the Class III malocclusion treated with maxillary expansion, facemask therapy and corrective orthodontic. A 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  Renato Rodrigues de Almeida; Luiz Eduardo Alessio; Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Arnaldo Pinzan; Luiz Sérgio Vieira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.