Literature DB >> 6929920

Variability of passively recorded centric relation.

R L Simon, J I Nicholls.   

Abstract

1. Centric relation in patients without clinical signs or symptoms of mandibular dysfunction is a small range of mandibular positions. 2. The average range of shift was 0.302 mm mediolaterally and 0.278 mm anteroposteriorly for all five subjects. 3. There is no significant difference between the ranges of mandibular positions recorded using chin-point guidance, chin-point guidance with ramus support, or bimanual manipulation. 4. This technique of comparing mandibular positions dictated by centric relation records is sufficiently sensitive to reveal minimum ranges of biologic variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6929920     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90040-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  3 in total

1.  Accuracy of transfer of bite recording to simulated prosthetic reconstructions.

Authors:  D Hellmann; E Etz; N N Giannakopoulos; P Rammelsberg; M Schmitter; H J Schindler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Condylar displacement between centric relation and maximum intercuspation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Soo Young Kim Weffort; Solange Mongelli de Fantini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of Techniques for Obtaining Centric Relation Based on the Reproducibility of the Condylar Positions in Centric Relation-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; André Pinheiro de Magalhães Bertoz; André Luiz de Melo Moreno; Marcelo Coelho Goiato
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-12-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.