Literature DB >> 6928881

Nonresponse bias to mail survey questionnaires within a professional population.

E J Hovland, E Romberg, E F Moreland.   

Abstract

Mail survey questionnaires are often used in dental research. In most instances, results depend on a single mailing and an incomplete return rate. The possible bias resulting from excluding nonresponders in tabuling data from mail survey questionnaires in a dentist population was investigated. Two different questionnaires, one soliciting attitudes, the other knowledge, were sent to randomly selected dentists. The differences between the responders and the nonresponders were analyzed with respect to the dentists' demographic data, attitudes, and knowledge. It was concluded that: (1) subject matter does affect dentist response rates to mailed survey questionnaires, (2) there are no differences in demographic data between dentist responders and nonresponders, and (3) nonresponse bias does not affect the results of dental surveys on a typical dentist response rate.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6928881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


  19 in total

1.  Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  William L Cull; Karen G O'Connor; Sanford Sharp; Suk-fong S Tang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Smoking cessation counseling practices of Texas pharmacists.

Authors:  Angela Meshack; Aisha Morris Moultry; Shaohua Hu; Alfred L McAlister
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2009-06

3.  Digital dental radiology in Belgium: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Robin Snel; Ellen Van De Maele; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Massachusetts emergency departments' resources and physicians' knowledge of management of traumatic dental injuries.

Authors:  Howard L Needleman; Keri Stucenski; Peter W Forbes; Qiaoli Chen; Anne M Stack
Journal:  Dent Traumatol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Use of genetic tests among neurologists and psychiatrists: knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and needs for training.

Authors:  Melissa Salm; Kristopher Abbate; Paul Appelbaum; Ruth Ottman; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Roy Alcalay; Jill Goldman; Alexander Malik Curtis; Christopher Leech; Katherine Johansen Taber; Robert Klitzman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Radiographic diagnosis of proximal caries-influence of experience and gender of the dental staff.

Authors:  Margrit-Ann Geibel; S Carstens; U Braisch; A Rahman; M Herz; A Jablonski-Momeni
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Psychiatrists' views of the genetic bases of mental disorders and behavioral traits and their use of genetic tests.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Kristopher J Abbate; Wendy K Chung; Karen Marder; Ruth Ottman; Katherine Johansen Taber; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.254

8.  Views of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among psychiatrists and neurologists.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Kristopher J Abbate; Wendy K Chung; Ruth Ottman; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.142

9.  Use of local anesthesia during dental rehabilitation with general anesthesia: a survey of dentist anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Janice A Townsend; Joseph L Hagan; Megann Smiley
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2014

10.  A survey of experience-based preference of Nickel-Titanium rotary files and incidence of fracture among general dentists.

Authors:  Woocheol Lee; Minju Song; Euiseong Kim; Hyojin Lee; Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2012-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.