Literature DB >> 6928742

Biomechanics of differences in lower facial height.

G S Throckmorton, R A Finn, W H Bell.   

Abstract

A two-dimensional model which allows calculation of mechanical advantage of the human temporalis and masseter muscles is presented. The model is manipulated to demonstrate how selected differences in facial morphology affect the mechanical advantage of the muscles. The model is then used to evaluate the differences in mechanical advantage between patients with the long face syndrome and those with the short face syndrome. Differences in facial morphology between these two groups result in significant differences in the mechanical advantages of their muscles. Mechanical advantage may, in part, explain observed differences in bite force between the two groups. The model suggests that some surgical procedures used to correct facial disharmonies may have a significant effect on the mechanical advantage of the jaw muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6928742     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90106-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  16 in total

1.  Nodal pathway genes are down-regulated in facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Romain Nicot; Molly Hottenstein; Gwenael Raoul; Joel Ferri; Michael Horton; John W Tobias; Elisabeth Barton; Patrick Gelé; James J Sciote
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 2.  Combining geometric morphometrics and functional simulation: an emerging toolkit for virtual functional analyses.

Authors:  Paul O'Higgins; Samuel N Cobb; Laura C Fitton; Flora Gröning; Roger Phillips; Jia Liu; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the relationship between masticatory performance and skeletal malocclusion.

Authors:  Jung-Chul Park; Hyun-Seung Shin; Jung-Yul Cha; Jong-Tae Park
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Fiber-type differences in masseter muscle associated with different facial morphologies.

Authors:  Anthea Rowlerson; Gwénaël Raoul; Yousif Daniel; John Close; Claude-Alain Maurage; Joel Ferri; James J Sciote
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  [Orthodontic surgical treatment of class III--the electromyographic effects on the masticatory and facial musculatures].

Authors:  G Göz; U Joos
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1991-06

6.  A three-dimensional method to calculate mechanical advantage in mandibular function : Intra- and interexaminer reliability study.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez-Ayala; Alfonso Sánchez-Ayala; Rafaela Cristina Kolodzejezyk; Vanessa Migliorini Urban; Manuel Óscar Lagravère; Nara Hellen Campanha
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Association of Dysplastic Coronoid Process with Long-Face Morphology.

Authors:  T Chen; Z Liu; C Xue; W Tian; D Bai; Y P Chen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Evaluation of mandibular morphologic measurements and trabecular structure among subgroups of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Merve Gonca; Dilara Nil Gunacar; Taha Emre Kose; Irem Karamehmetoglu
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Muscle Force Changes After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy.

Authors:  Dominik Pachnicz; Przemysław Stróżyk
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Making Space for Permanent Molars in Growing Baboon (Papio anubis) and Great Ape (Pan paniscus and P. troglodytes) Mandibles: Possible Ontogenetic Strategies and Solutions.

Authors:  Julia C Boughner
Journal:  Anat Res Int       Date:  2011-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.