Literature DB >> 6903430

Macula and periphery: their contributions to the visual evoked potentials (VEP) in humans.

J Röver, G Schaubele, K Berndt.   

Abstract

An alternating checkerboard pattern subtending a visual angle of 25 min arc is capable of eliciting remarkably high amplitudes of visually evoked potentials (VEP) outside a visual angle of 2.5 degree. These contributions cannot be neglected when evaluating a VEP response obtained with a larger field of stimulation. When the retina is consecutively stimulated by concentric frame-shaped stimuli, the algebraic sum of all single cortical responses augmented the cortical response obtained when stimulating the whole field simultaneously by approximately 30%. This finding may be explained by the inhibiting interactions within the receptive field organisation of the retina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6903430     DOI: 10.1007/bf00414536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0065-6100


  6 in total

1.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A quantitative analysis of spatial summation of excitation and inhibition within the receptive field of retinal ganglion cells of cats.

Authors:  O J Grüsser
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  M R Harter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Contribution of fovea and parafovea to the visual evoked response.

Authors:  W J Rietveld; W E Tordoir; J W Duyff
Journal:  Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl       Date:  1965

5.  Contribution of foveo-parafoveal quadrants to the visual evoked response.

Authors:  W J Rietveld; W E Tordoir; J R Hagenouw; K J van Dongen
Journal:  Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl       Date:  1965

6.  Cerebral potentials evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry.

Authors:  W A Cobb; H B Morton; G Ettlinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Effect of different stimulus configurations on the visual evoked potential (VEP).

Authors:  Naveen K Yadav; Diana P Ludlam; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Colored focal visual evoked potentials by cathode ray tube versus scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  F Rigaudière; J F Le Gargasson; J E Guez; Y Grall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Visual evoked potentials to various check patterns.

Authors:  J Röver; M Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Fullfield and extrafoveal visual evoked potentials in healthy eyes: reference data for a curved OLED display.

Authors:  Sabine Baumgarten; Tabea Hoberg; Tibor Lohmann; Babac Mazinani; Peter Walter; Antonis Koutsonas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Visual evoked potentials as an aid in evaluating brain dysfunction following concussional injury: an animal model.

Authors:  J Röver; C Ostertag; G Schaubele; M Hüttel; M Klar
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1980

6.  Pattern electroretinogram, visual evoked potential and psychophysical functions in maculopathy.

Authors:  A Junghardt; H Wildberger; B Török
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response.

Authors:  O Katsumi; T Hirose; T Tanino
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.