Literature DB >> 690334

Range effect in the perception of voicing.

S A Brady, C J Darwin.   

Abstract

The location of the voicing boundary in the perception of initial stop consonants is shown to vary according to the range of voice-onset times used in a block of trials and according to the order in which blocks covering different ranges are presented. Although these range effects introduce methodological complications into the interpretation of adaptation experiments, they appear to be qualitatively different from adaptation effects and, it is suggested, may provide a metric for assessing the auditory tolerance of phonological categories.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 690334     DOI: 10.1121/1.381849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners.

Authors:  R A Yamada; Y Tohkura
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

2.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.

Authors:  J L Miller; L E Volaitis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-12

3.  Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  Laura M Getz; Joseph C Toscano
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Grouping of vowel harmonics by frequency modulation: absence of effects on phonemic categorization.

Authors:  R B Gardner; C J Darwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-09

5.  Contextual effects in vowel perception I: anchor-induced contrast effects.

Authors:  J R Sawusch; H C Nusbaum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-04

6.  Use of vocalic cues to consonant voicing and native language background: the influence of experimental design.

Authors:  C S Crowther; V Mann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05

7.  Plucks and bows are not categorically perceived.

Authors:  S M Rosen; P Howell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-08

Review 8.  Speech perception as categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The effect of gap duration on the perception of fluent versus disfluent speech.

Authors:  Haley J Warner; D H Whalen; Daphna Harel; Eric S Jackson
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Testing the double phonemic boundary in bilinguals.

Authors:  Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Randy L Diehl; Craig Champlin
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.017

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.