Literature DB >> 6889492

Demonstration of a training response by the Canadian home fitness test.

M Jetté, J Mongeon, R J Shephard.   

Abstract

The relative merits of the Astrand nomogram and the CHFT formula for prediction of maximum oxygen intake (VO2max) have been tested in 35 men and women during performance of the advanced version of the Canadian Home Fitness Test in a laboratory setting. Prior to training, systematic errors relative to direct treadmill measurements of maximum oxygen intake were Astrand-10.1% (male) and-1.4% (female), and CHFT 5.6% (male), and 2.2% (female), the error of the Astrand procedure being statistically significant for the men. Training was effected by a walk/jog prescription or rope-skipping and calisthenics. Following training, data analysis indicated that the CHFT prediction formula distinguished quite well between the behaviour of experimental and control subjects. The Astrand procedure showed a greater increment in VO2(max) than the CHFT formula for the experimental subjects (significantly so in the women), but it also predicted a large and spurious change in many of the controls, so that in the men responses did not differ between trained and control subjects. Further comparisons suggested that the CHFT procedure gave a closer approximation to direct treadmill estimates of training response than did the Astrand nomogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6889492     DOI: 10.1007/bf02334062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  7 in total

1.  The Canadian Home Fitness Test as a predictor for aerobic capacity.

Authors:  M Jetté; J Campbell; J Mongeon; R Routhier
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1976-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The validity of the oxygen conductance equation.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Int Z Angew Physiol       Date:  1969

3.  Computer programs for solution of the Astrand nomogram and the calculation of body surface area.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  A comparison between predicted VO2 max from the Astrand procedure and the Canadian Home Fitness Test.

Authors:  M Jetté
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1979-09

5.  Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age.

Authors:  I ASTRAND
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1960

6.  Some factors affecting accuracy of Canadian Home Fitness Test scores.

Authors:  R J Shephard; M Cox; P Corey; R Smyth
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1979-09

7.  A current view of Canadian cardiorespiratory fitness.

Authors:  D A Bailey; R J Shephard; R L Mirwald; G A McBride
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1974-07-06       Impact factor: 8.262

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Canadian Home Fitness Test. 1991 update.

Authors:  R J Shephard; S Thomas; I Weller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Exercise prescription: principles and current limitations.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Factors influencing the exercise behaviour of patients.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 11.136

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.