Literature DB >> 6886967

Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: should the doctor tell all?

S M Miller, C E Mangan.   

Abstract

This study explored the interacting effects of personal dispositions and situational conditions on the stress response. Forty gynecologic patients about to undergo a diagnostic procedure (colposcopy) were divided into information seekers (monitors) and information avoiders (blunters). Half in each group were exposed to voluminous preparatory information, and half to the usual low level of information. Subjective, physiological, and behavioral measures of arousal and discomfort were obtained before, during, and after the procedure. Overall, low-information patients expressed less subjective arousal than high-information patients, and blunters showed less subjective and behavioral arousal than monitors. In addition, patients' level of psychophysiological arousal was lower when the level of preparatory information was consistent with their coping style; that is, blunters were less aroused with low information and monitors were less aroused with high information. Further evidence was gained for the utility and validity of a new scale for identifying monitors and blunters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6886967     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.45.1.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  46 in total

1.  Surviving gynecologic cancer and coping with sexual morbidity: an international problem.

Authors:  B.L. Andersen; J. van Der Does
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  A measure of informed choice.

Authors:  T M Marteau; E Dormandy; S Michie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Coping with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Janice Abbott
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Matching intra-procedural information with coping style reduces psychophysiological arousal in women undergoing colposcopy.

Authors:  Susanna Kola; Jane C Walsh; Brian M Hughes; Siobhán Howard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-06-24

5.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Let's engage the patient within us: a personal perspective on patient engagement.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Madeleine King; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Psychological coping with acute pain: an examination of the role of endogenous opioid mechanisms.

Authors:  S Bruehl; C R Carlson; J F Wilson; J A Norton; G Colclough; M J Brady; J J Sherman; J A McCubbin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1996-04

8.  Testing messages to encourage discussion of clinical trials among cancer survivors and their physicians: examining monitoring style and message detail.

Authors:  Lindsay R Duncan; Amy E Latimer; Elizabeth Pomery; Susan E Rivers; Michelle C Berotoli; Peter Salovey
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Effects of stressor predictability on escape learning and sleep in mice.

Authors:  Mayumi Machida; Linghui Yang; Laurie L Wellman; Larry D Sanford
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Coping styles, paradox, and the cold pressor task.

Authors:  J S Efran; R L Chorney; L M Ascher; M D Lukens
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1989-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.