Literature DB >> 6885840

Biocompatibility test procedures for materials evaluation in vitro. I. Comparative test system sensitivity.

H J Johnson, S J Northup, P A Seagraves, P J Garvin, R F Wallin.   

Abstract

Relative sensitivity of in vitro biocompatibility test systems was explored. Cellular responses of 12 standardized cell lines to 20 materials representing a range of toxicity were measured. Each cell line and material combination was tested in duplicate using four different culture methods, and each culture plate was examined by two graders. Results of the tissue culture assays were compared to those obtained for the same materials in vivo using a 5-day rabbit intramuscular implant assay. Methods involving measurement of cellular growth (colony counts or percent of confluence) in serum-fortified media extracts of test samples were generally more sensitive and discriminating than those in which test materials were placed directly in cell cultures (measurement of zone of growth inhibition). There was good agreement between graders for all test methods. Antibiotics were not used in the test program. Based upon sensitivity, reproducibility, ability to discriminate materials, and grader agreement, 4 of the 12 cell lines and 2 of the 4 test methods appeared most suitable for screening and evaluation of materials. Agreement of results using these four cell lines with intramuscular implantation tests for the 30 materials ranged from 60 to 90%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6885840     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820170403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  8 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of a new injectable calcium phosphate material.

Authors:  G Grimandi; P Weiss; F Millot; G Daculsi
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-03-15

2.  In vitro biocompatibility of orthodontic miniscrews with human gingival fibroblast and SAOS-2 osteoblast cultures.

Authors:  Hannah Finke; Bernd Koos; Helge Fischer-Brandies; Martha Es-Souni
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Biocompatibility testing of an experimental fluoride releasing resin using human gingival epithelial cells in vitro.

Authors:  F H Kasten; L F Pineda; P E Schneider; H R Rawls; T A Foster
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1989-01

4.  Comparative investigation of the biocompatibility of various silicon nitride ceramic qualities in vitro.

Authors:  A Neumann; T Reske; M Held; K Jahnke; C Ragoss; H R Maier
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Methods for the measurement of cell and tissue compatibility including tissue regeneration processes.

Authors:  Cornelia Wiegand; Uta-Christina Hipler
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2008-03-11

6.  Silicone based polyurethane materials: a promising biocompatible elastomeric formulation for cardiovascular applications.

Authors:  E Briganti; P Losi; A Raffi; M Scoccianti; A Munaò; G Soldani
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  A method for toxicological evaluation of biomaterials based on colony formation of V79 cells.

Authors:  Y Kotoura; T Yamamuro; J Shikata; Y Kakutani; T Kitsugi; H Tanaka
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1985

Review 8.  Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Margaux Salètes; Marta Vartin; Caroline Mocquot; Charlène Chevalier; Brigitte Grosgogeat; Pierre Colon; Nina Attik
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.