Literature DB >> 6884070

Contributions of unfrozen fraction and of salt concentration to the survival of slowly frozen human erythrocytes: influence of warming rate.

P Mazur, N Rigopoulos.   

Abstract

The general belief is that slow freezing injury is either the result of exposure to high salt concentrations or the result of excessive cell shrinkage. Increased salt concentration arises as increasing amounts of pure ice precipitate out of solution during freezing and cause the liquid-filled channels in which the cells are sequestered to dwindle in size. Cell shrinkage is an osmotic response to the concentration of external solutes. The consensus has been that the injury is related to the composition of the solution in these channels and not to the amount of residual liquid. Ordinarily, salt concentration and the amount of liquid in the unfrozen channels are reciprocally related; but they can be separated within limits by varying the total concentration of solutes in the suspending medium while holding the mass ratio of additive to salt constant, and by then slowly freezing samples to various subzero temperatures, chosen to produce various molalities of salt, while holding the unfrozen fraction constant, or vice versa. We have recently reported (9) that when human red cells are frozen under these conditions and thawed rapidly, survival is more dependent on the unfrozen water fraction than it is on the salt concentration in that fraction. The present work compares these results with those obtained with slow thawing. While the general conclusion remains unaltered, slowly thawed cells were able to survive the freezing of a higher fraction of extracellular water than were rapidly thawed cells. Calculations were made of the changes in cell volume during the equilibration with glycerol and the subsequent freezing involved in these experiments. Cell size and cell solute concentration were found to be independent of the fraction of unfrozen extracellular water, but cell survival was strongly dependent on that fraction. If applicable to other than human red cells, this finding is likely to require major modifications in current views of slow-freezing injury and its prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6884070     DOI: 10.1016/0011-2240(83)90016-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.487


  7 in total

1.  Osmotic responses of preimplantation mouse and bovine embryos and their cryobiological implications.

Authors:  P Mazur; U Schneider
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1986-08

2.  The temperature of intracellular ice formation in mouse oocytes vs. the unfrozen fraction at that temperature.

Authors:  Peter Mazur; Irina L Pinn; F W Kleinhans
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 2.487

3.  Kinetics of water loss and the likelihood of intracellular freezing in mouse ova. Influence of the method of calculating the temperature dependence of water permeability.

Authors:  P Mazur; W F Rall; S P Leibo
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1984-09

4.  On the mechanism of injury to slowly frozen erythrocytes.

Authors:  D E Pegg; M P Diaper
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Research Note: Evaluation of two methods for adding cryoprotectant to semen and effects of bovine serum albumin on quality characteristics of cryopreserved rooster spermatozoa.

Authors:  Alireza Behnamifar; Berenice Bernal; Olga Torres; Héctor Luis-Chincoya; María GGil; Pedro García-Casado; Shaban Rahimi; Henri Woelders; Julián Santiago-Moreno
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Methods of Cryoprotectant Preservation: Allogeneic Cellular Bone Grafts and Potential Effects.

Authors:  W Blake Martin; Renaud Sicard; Shabnam M Namin; Timothy Ganey
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Cryopreservation of testicular tissue or testicular cell suspensions: a pivotal step in fertility preservation.

Authors:  J Onofre; Y Baert; K Faes; E Goossens
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 15.610

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.