Literature DB >> 6884040

The interpretation of laterality.

I C McManus.   

Abstract

It is suggested that many analyses of laterality are fundamentally confused in that they fail to distinguish between differences in degree of laterality and differences in direction of laterality, and that direction and degree of laterality have different biological and psychological interpretations. Conventional statistical tests, such as analysis of variance or non-parametric procedures, are unable to differentiate the two measures, and necessarily produce uninterpretable results. A maximum likelihood method is described which can discriminate between direction and degree, and its applications to factorial, test-retest, and repeated measure designs is explained. Two worked examples are also given, one based on hypothetical data, the other on actual data.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6884040     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(83)80014-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  2 in total

1.  Crossed cerebral lateralization for verbal and visuo-spatial function in a pair of handedness discordant monozygotic twins: MRI and fMRI brain imaging.

Authors:  Silke Lux; Simon Keller; Clare Mackay; George Ebers; John C Marshall; Lynne Cherkas; Roozbeh Rezaie; Neil Roberts; Gereon R Fink; Jennifer M Gurd
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Ultrasonography and handedness. Don't confuse direction with degree.

Authors:  I C McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.