Literature DB >> 6881319

Relation of cranial base flexure to cranial form and mandibular position.

D Anderson, F Popovich.   

Abstract

From the annually examined sample of the Burlington Growth Centre, the 10% of the boys and girls with the largest, most open cranial base angles were contrasted with the 10% with the smallest, most closed cranial base angles at ages 4, 8, 12, and 16 years with respect to cranial length, width and height, cranial base length, mandibular condyle position, and Angle Class of occlusion. Both groups had crania of similar length, width, and cephalic index, and similar anterior cranial base length. The children with the flattest cranial bases had significantly larger upper cranial height, but much smaller lower cranial height, and as a result had smaller total cranial height than the children with the most closed cranial base angles. Children with the flattest cranial bases had a slightly shorter posterior cranial base region, and the mandibular condyles were located further backward and upward. These children showed a strong tendency to Class II molar relationships. The condyles of the closed cranial base angle groups were more forward and downward, but none of the children had Class III occlusions, and most were normal or Class I. These results do not support the views of Weidenreich (1943, 1945, 1946, 1947), Enlow with others (1973, 1975, 1980) and Lavelle with others (1977, 1979), but agree with the findings of Björk (1955) in 20-year-old males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6881319     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330610206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  9 in total

1.  A computerized tomography study of the morphological interrelationship between the temporal bones and the craniofacial complex.

Authors:  Helder Nunes Costa; Rudolf Slavicek; Sadao Sato
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 malocclusion in a Saudi population living in the western region.

Authors:  Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-11-02

3.  An anthropometric study of relationships between the clival angle and craniofacial measurements in adult human skulls.

Authors:  L Guyot; O Richard; P Adalian; C Bartoli; O Dutour; G Leonetti
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Evaluation of relationship between cranial base angle and maxillofacial morphology in Indian population: A cephalometric study.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Amarjitsingh Bhatia; Dolly Patel; Nishit Mehta; Harshik Parekh; Rahul Trivedi
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-07

5.  Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Yalil Augusto Rodriguez-Cardenas; Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillen; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

6.  Morphological configuration of the cranial base among children aged 8 to 12 years.

Authors:  Lina Cossio; Jorge López; Zulma Vanessa Rueda; Paola Botero-Mariaca
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-06-14

7.  Relationship between cephalometric cranial base and anterior-posterior features in an Iranian population.

Authors:  Mohammad Monirifard; Saeid Sadeghian; Zahra Afshari; Elahe Rafiei; Asana Vali Sichani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-01-21

8.  Developmental Abnormalities of the Skull Base in Patients with Turner Syndrome.

Authors:  Adina-Ioana Tecuta-Busoi; Marius Matei; Lucian Mihai Florescu; Ioana Andreea Gheonea
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2020-12-31

9.  Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???

Authors:  Subraya Mogra; Vorvady Surendra Shetty; Siddarth Shetty
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.