Literature DB >> 6879200

Science, risk, and public policy.

W D Ruckelshaus.   

Abstract

A climate of fear now dominates the discussion of environmental issues. The scientific community can help alleviate this fear by making a greater effort to explain to the public the uncertainties involved in estimates of risk. Current statutory mandates designed to protect public health both demand levels of protection that technology cannot achieve and are uncoordinated across government agencies. A common statutory framework for dealing with environmental risks is needed. In addition, care must be taken to separate the scientific process of assessing risk from the use of such assessments, together with economic and policy considerations, in the management of risks through regulatory action.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6879200     DOI: 10.1126/science.6879200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  5 in total

1.  Determining conservation priorities.

Authors:  R C Buckley
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  A Framework for Climate Change-Related Research to Inform Environmental Protection.

Authors:  C P Weaver; C A Miller
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Using exposure bands for rapid decision making in the RISK21 tiered exposure assessment.

Authors:  M Dellarco; R Zaleski; B J Gaborek; H Qian; C A Bellin; P Egeghy; N Heard; O Jolliet; D R Lander; N Sunger; K S Stylianou; J Y Tanir
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Reframing climate change assessments around risk: recommendations for the US National Climate Assessment.

Authors:  C P Weaver; R H Moss; K L Ebi; P H Gleick; P C Stern; C Tebaldi; R S Wilson; J L Arvai
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 6.947

5.  Regulating Ionizing Radiation Based on Metrics for Evaluation of Regulatory Science Claims.

Authors:  A Alan Moghissi; Richard Calderone; Furzan Azam; Teresa Nowak; Sarah Sheppard; Dennis K McBride; Lisa Jaeger
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.658

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.