Literature DB >> 6878192

Blood pressure reductions: correcting for regression to the mean.

D S Shepard, L J Finison.   

Abstract

Reductions in high blood pressure (BP) from participating in screening and treatment programs are often assessed by comparing BP measurements before and after participation. The interpretation of such changes in measured blood pressure is confounded by the tendency of high pressures to decline as a result of a statistical artifact--regression to the mean. The problem arises whenever baseline measurements are used both for selection of participants and for comparisons with pressures obtained later. We developed a statistical model which predicts the average decline due to regression for participants in a screening or treatment program. This regression effect must be subtracted from the observed reduction in BP (the difference between baseline and later measurements) to obtain the average net reduction in BP from the program. The regression effect is estimated as the product of two factors. The first factor is the proportion of the variance in the baseline (preprogram) measurement due to measurement error and the short-term variation (e.g., 0.24 for two replications averaged). The second factor is the difference between the mean baseline pressure of full participants and that of the underlying population of potential participants. The model was first illustrated with successive BP measurements from community screening programs, where the "program" was only remeasurement. The mean observed decline in diastolic BP between screens for 145 persons with elevated baseline BP was 7 mm Hg. After adjustment for regression to the mean, the net decline between screens was estimated to be 2 mm Hg. This decline is apparently due to the pressor effect, or stress of screening, and agrees with findings from other studies. Next the model was applied to the treatment phase of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program. Overall, net reductions predicted by the model agree with those from independent measurements to within 0.1 mm Hg. The findings indicate the one can compute net reductions in BP from before-and-after comparisons in screening and treatment programs with reasonable accuracy, and these net reductions are generally much smaller than the crude BP declines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6878192     DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(83)90239-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  11 in total

1.  Regression to the mean. A threat to exercise science?

Authors:  Roy J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Paranormal healing and hypertension.

Authors:  J J Beutler; J T Attevelt; S A Schouten; J A Faber; E J Dorhout Mees; G G Geijskes
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-28

3.  'Third drug' trial.

Authors:  D G Altman; S G Thompson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-03-31

4.  Clinic-Based Strategies to Reach United States Million Hearts 2022 Blood Pressure Control Goals.

Authors:  Brandon K Bellows; Natalia Ruiz-Negrón; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Jordan B King; Mark J Pletcher; Andrew E Moran; Valy Fontil
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-06-05

5.  Regression to the mean and changes in risk behavior following study enrollment in a cohort of U.S. women at risk for HIV.

Authors:  James P Hughes; Danielle F Haley; Paula M Frew; Carol E Golin; Adaora A Adimora; Irene Kuo; Jessica Justman; Lydia Soto-Torres; Jing Wang; Sally Hodder
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Association of Repeated Measurements With Blood Pressure Control in Primary Care.

Authors:  Douglas Einstadter; Shari D Bolen; James E Misak; David S Bar-Shain; Randall D Cebul
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Reliability of morning, before-dinner, and at-bedtime home blood pressure measurements in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Takeshi Fujiwara; Satoshi Hoshide; Hiroshi Kanegae; Masafumi Nishizawa; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Assessing regression to the mean effects in health care initiatives.

Authors:  Ariel Linden
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Net Blood Pressure Reduction Following 9 Months of Lifestyle and High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention in Individuals With Abdominal Obesity.

Authors:  Philippe Sosner; Laurent Bosquet; Daniel Herpin; Valérie Guilbeault; Elise Latour; Laurie Paquette-Tannir; Martin Juneau; Anil Nigam; Mathieu Gayda
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Integrating self blood pressure monitoring into the routine management of uncontrolled hypertension: translating evidence to practice.

Authors:  Sonia Angell; Seth Guthartz; Mehul Dalal; Victoria Foster; Velvie Pogue; Alice Wei; Shadi Chamany; Stella Yi
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.