Literature DB >> 6875980

Perceptual complexity of lexical, surface structure, and deep structure types of ambiguous sentences and change in heart rate.

A K Mohanty.   

Abstract

Studies comparing lexical, surface-, and deep-structure types of ambiguous sentences with unambiguous ones for perceptual complexity show conflicting findings mainly because of task artifacts and lack of adequate control of confounding variables. In the present study, three types of ambiguous sentences and matched unambiguous controls were compared. Acceleration and deceleration measures of heart rate (HR) were used since these have been shown to reliably indicate complexity of cognitive activity. The study used a Groups x Ambiguity Condition x Ambiguous Sentence-Type x Sentence-Clusters repeated measures Latin Square ANOVA design which permitted isolation of variance related to the specific sample of sentences used. Eighteen low-bias ambiguous sentences (six from each type) and their control pairs, divided into three lists, were presented to 30 male undergraduates. Analysis of data showed: (1) significant Ambiguity x Type and Ambiguity effects for the percentage of increase in HR during processing of the sentence and, (2) significant effect of Ambiguity for the percentage of decrease in HR. These results were interpreted as showing that while low-bias ambiguous sentences are perceptually more complex than unambiguous ones, the effect of ambiguity may be greater for deep-structure type of ambiguous sentences than for lexical and surface-structure types.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6875980     DOI: 10.1007/bf01067675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  5 in total

1.  The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences.

Authors:  T G Bever; M F Garrett; R Hurtig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-09

2.  Prior context and the perception of lexically ambiguous sentences.

Authors:  V M Holmes; R Arwas; M F Garrett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-01

3.  Physiological activity and detection: the effects of attentional requirements and the prediction of performance.

Authors:  M G Coles
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Attention and heart rate: a critical appraisal of the hypothesis of Lacey and Lacey.

Authors:  W W Hahn
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Mean heart rate predicted by task demand characteristics.

Authors:  H Dahl; D P Spence
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 4.016

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.