Literature DB >> 6875951

Influence of luminance gradient reversal on simple cells in feline striate cortex.

P Hammond, D M MacKay.   

Abstract

1. The sensitivity of simple cells to luminance gradient reversal in bar stimuli has been investigated in the striate cortex of lightly anaesthetized cats.2. The influence of segment(s) of one polarity of contrast, partially masking or added end-on to a bar of reversed contrast, was assessed against a stationary textured background (of intermediate average luminance), which was itself without influence on cell behaviour.3. In either configuration, short segments of reversed contrast were suppressive of bar response, to an extent varying with location along the receptive-field axis, but much greater than predictable from length-summation characteristics. Response suppression, even by very short segments, was often total.4. The effects of longer segments, added end-on to a bar of opposite contrast, depended on the extent of length summation exhibited by each cell. With progressive extension of these segments, some recovery of response occurred in a few simple cells with larger receptive fields, but not in small-field simple cells. The behaviour of end-stopped simple cells was comparable in all respects to that of their end-free counterparts, within the length-summation zone; thereafter, invasion of the inhibitory end-zones by bars of either polarity elicited a generalized decline in response.5. Where responsiveness was restored by adding longer segments of opposite polarity, the response peak shifted to the discharge centre appropriate to that polarity.6. All these results were found with either polarity of contrast, i.e. a light bar plus dark segments or the converse.7. Similar results were obtained for motion in either direction across the receptive field; and also for flash-presentation, over either the centre or flanks (whether ;on' or ;off') of the receptive field.8. The effectiveness of contrasting added segments was assessed as a function of location along the receptive-field axis for flash-presented and for moving stimuli. Suppressive effects were greatest over the centre of the receptive field, declining progressively in either direction along its axis, but over greater distances than anticipated from length summation.9. None of the results presented could have been predicted from length-summation characteristics. They are strongly suggestive of gating, rather than linear, antagonistic interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6875951      PMCID: PMC1199095          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  24 in total

1.  Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Receptive field classes of cells in the striate cortex of the cat.

Authors:  G H Henry
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-09-09       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Orientation specificity of cells in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  G H Henry; B Dreher; P O Bishop
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Residual eye movements in receptive-field studies of paralyzed cats.

Authors:  R W Rodieck; J D Pettigrew; P O Bishop; T Nikara
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Striate neurons: receptive field concepts.

Authors:  P O Bishop; G H Henry
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-05

6.  Responses to visual contours: spatio-temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurones.

Authors:  P O Bishop; J S Coombs; G H Henry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  A reappraisal of the feline mesopic range [proceedings].

Authors:  B Ahmed; P Hammond; H C Nothdurft
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Orientation tuning of cells in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  P Hammond; D P Andrews
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  On the use of nitrous oxide/oxygen mixtures for anaesthesia in cats [proceedings].

Authors:  P Hammond
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture.

Authors:  P Hammond; D M MacKay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  Symbolic grouping versus simple cell models.

Authors:  A Brookes; K A Stevens
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Directional tuning of cells in area 18 of the feline visual cortex for visual noise, bar and spot stimuli: a comparison with area 17.

Authors:  J M Crook
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Areal influences on complex cells in cat striate cortex: stimulus-specificity of width and length summation.

Authors:  P Hammond; I M Munden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Space and spatial frequency: analysis and representation in the macaque striate cortex.

Authors:  J J Kulikowski; T R Vidyasagar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Response of cat retinal ganglion cells to motion of visual texture.

Authors:  B Ahmed; P Hammond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Directional tuning interactions between moving oriented and textured stimuli in complex cells of feline striate cortex.

Authors:  P Hammond; A T Smith
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Motion after-effects in cat striate cortex elicited by moving gratings.

Authors:  P Hammond; G S Mouat; A T Smith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Influence of luminance gradient reversal on complex cells in feline striate cortex.

Authors:  P Hammond; D M MacKay
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.182

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.