Literature DB >> 6875897

Receptor potentials of lizard hair cells with free-standing stereocilia: responses to acoustic clicks.

K Baden-Kristensen, T F Weiss.   

Abstract

Receptor potentials of single hair cells in the free-standing region of the basilar papilla of the anaesthetized alligator lizard were measured intracellularly with micropipettes. Stimuli were primarily acoustic pulses (clicks) delivered to the tympanic membrane. The receptor potential was independent of click repetition rate for the range 10-150 clicks/s. This property is presumed to be the basis of the rate independence of the extracellular cochlear microphonic potential. The receptor potential wave-form consisted of a fast oscillatory component (or oscillation) superimposed on a usually positive (depolarizing) slow component. Reversal of the stimulus polarity resulted in a reversal of the polarity of the oscillations; the polarity of the slow component remained unchanged. The relative magnitudes of the two components depended on click level. At the higher click levels the magnitudes of the slow and oscillatory components were comparable. The relation of the receptor potential to the stimulus was non-linear; the peak-to-peak magnitude of the receptor potential increased less than proportionately with increasing sound-pressure level, and reversal of the stimulus polarity did not result in a reversal of the receptor potential. The receptor-potential magnitude for high-level clicks ranged from 1-13 mV peak-to-peak with an average value of 3.5 mV. At the lower click levels the magnitude of the slow component was much smaller than that of the oscillatory component. The relation of the receptor potential to the acoustic stimulus approached that of a linear system, the magnitude of the receptor potential became approximately proportional to the sound-pressure level, and reversal of the stimulus polarity resulted in approximate reversal of the receptor potential. For low-level stimuli the frequency of the oscillations of the receptor potential in response to clicks was approximately equal to the frequency of maximal a.c. response to tones. Apparently, both phenomena reflect the frequency selectivity of the processes generating the receptor potential. The frequency of oscillations in the click response varied from one cell to another (range of 1.0-2.2 kHz in this study). The results are qualitatively consistent with a model (Weiss, Mulroy & Altmann, 1974) that contains a linear, band-pass filter followed by a rectifier followed by a low-pass filter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6875897      PMCID: PMC1197378          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  23 in total

1.  Low-noise chambers for auditory research.

Authors:  I L Vér; R M Brown; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tuning of single fibers in the cochlear nerve of the alligator lizard: relation to receptor morphology.

Authors:  T F Weiss; M J Mulroy; R G Turner; C L Pike
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-10-08       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Intracellular electric responses to sound in a vertebrate cochlea.

Authors:  M J Mulroy; D W Altmann; T F Weiss; W T Peake
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Scanning electron microscope studies of some lizard basilar papillae.

Authors:  M R Miller
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1973-11

5.  Intracellular responses to acoustic clicks in the inner ear of the alligator lizard.

Authors:  T F Weiss; M J Mulroy; D W Altmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cochlear potential response at the round-window membrane of the cat--a reply to the comment of G. R. Price.

Authors:  T F Weiss; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Intracochlear potential recorded with micropipets. II. Responses in the cochlear scalae to tones.

Authors:  T F Weiss; W T Peake; H S Sohmer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intracochlear potential recorded with micropipets. I. Correlations with micropipet location.

Authors:  H S Sohmer; W T Peake; T F Weiss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Cochlear anatomy of the alligator lizard.

Authors:  M J Mulroy
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Receptor potentials from hair cells of the lateral line.

Authors:  G G Harris; L S Frishkopf; A Flock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  11 in total

1.  Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The voltage responses of hair cells in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  I J Russell; M Kössl
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Persistence of past stimulations: storing sounds within the inner ear.

Authors:  Jiefu Zheng; Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; Dingjun Zha; Fangyi Chen; Anna Magnusson; Alfred L Nuttall; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The response of hair cells in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea to tones.

Authors:  A R Cody; I J Russell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Receptor potentials of lizard cochlear hair cells with free-standing stereocilia in response to tones.

Authors:  T Holton; T F Weiss
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Frequency selectivity of hair cells and nerve fibres in the alligator lizard cochlea.

Authors:  T Holton; T F Weiss
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Organ of Corti potentials and the motion of the basilar membrane.

Authors:  Anders Fridberger; Jacques Boutet de Monvel; Jiefu Zheng; Ning Hu; Yuan Zou; Tianying Ren; Alfred Nuttall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 6.709

8.  A differentially amplified motion in the ear for near-threshold sound detection.

Authors:  Fangyi Chen; Dingjun Zha; Anders Fridberger; Jiefu Zheng; Niloy Choudhury; Steven L Jacques; Ruikang K Wang; Xiaorui Shi; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Haiqi Wen; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Wei Dong; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A mechanoelectrical mechanism for detection of sound envelopes in the hearing organ.

Authors:  Alfred L Nuttall; Anthony J Ricci; George Burwood; James M Harte; Stefan Stenfelt; Per Cayé-Thomasen; Tianying Ren; Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Yuan Zhang; Teresa Wilson; Thomas Lunner; Brian C J Moore; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.