Literature DB >> 6874357

Measuring routine nursing service efficiency: a comparison of cost per patient day and data envelopment analysis models.

T R Nunamaker.   

Abstract

This article provides an illustrative application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology to the measurement of routine nursing service efficiency at a group of Wisconsin hospitals. The DEA efficiency ratings and cost savings estimates are then compared to those resulting from application of Medicare's routine cost limitation to the sample data. DEA is also used to determine if any changes in the potential for efficient operations occurred during the 1978-1979 period. Empirical results were representative of the fundamental differences existing between the DEA and cost per patient day approaches. No evidence was found to support the notion that the overall potential for efficient delivery of routine services by the sample institutions was greater in one year than another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6874357      PMCID: PMC1068745     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  4 in total

1.  Classification of short-term general hospitals for control and equity.

Authors:  V M Trivedi
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Commentary--on the use of hospital classification models.

Authors:  B R Neumann
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Classification of community hospitals.

Authors:  P J Phillip; R N Iyer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Proposed Medicare regs would reduce hospitals' reimbursement.

Authors:  R W Bowman
Journal:  Mod Healthc       Date:  1979-07
  4 in total
  35 in total

1.  Benchmarking organ procurement organizations: a national study.

Authors:  Y A Ozcan; J W Begun; M M McKinney
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Efficiency measurement of health care: a review of non-parametric methods and applications.

Authors:  B Hollingsworth; P J Dawson; N Maniadakis
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1999-07

3.  The technical efficiency of hospitals under a single payer system: the case of Ontario community hospitals.

Authors:  T S Gruca; D Nath
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2001-06

Review 4.  Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care.

Authors:  Bruce Hollingsworth
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2003-11

5.  Data envelopment analysis model for the appraisal and relative performance evaluation of nurses at an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Ibrahim H Osman; Lynn N Berbary; Yusuf Sidani; Baydaa Al-Ayoubi; Ali Emrouznejad
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Rural Health Clinic efficiency and effectiveness: insight from a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Judith Ortiz; Natthani Meemon; Chiung-Ya Tang; Thomas T H Wan; Seung Chun Paek
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Measuring technical efficiency in primary health care: the effect of exogenous variables on results.

Authors:  José Manuel Cordero-Ferrera; Eva Crespo-Cebada; Luis R Murillo-Zamorano
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Technical efficiency in primary health care: does quality matter?

Authors:  Luis R Murillo-Zamorano; Carmelo Petraglia
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-03-20

9.  Organizational determinants of efficiency and effectiveness in mental health partial care programs.

Authors:  A P Schinnar; E Kamis-Gould; N Delucia; A B Rothbard
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  An efficiency data envelopment analysis model reinforced by classification and regression tree for hospital performance evaluation.

Authors:  Chun-Ling Chuang; Peng-Chan Chang; Rong-Ho Lin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.