Literature DB >> 6873012

Epigenetic effects of liver tumor promoters and implications for health effects.

G M Williams.   

Abstract

During chemical carcinogenesis in the liver, a population of abnormal cells in lesions referred to as altered foci precedes the appearance of neoplasms. Most altered foci do not develop further, but a small fraction progress to formation of neoplasms. Liver tumor promoters increase the fraction that progress. The mechanisms for this action of promoters may involve an effect on the cell membrane. Cells in vivo and in vitro exchange molecules through specialized membrane organelles known as gap junctions. Intercellular transfer of growth and/or differentiation regulating factors could be involved in suppressing the growth of initiated cells in the altered foci. Several liver tumor promoters have been found to inhibit intercellular communication in an in vitro liver culture system. This effect on the cell membrane could, thus, be the basis for the release of cells in foci for further growth into neoplasms. Such an epigenetic action would account for the requirement for high doses and prolonged exposure for certain liver tumor promoters. In addition, it implies a distinct type of health risk analysis for chemicals of this type. Several chemicals, particularly halogenated hydrocarbons, produce primarily or exclusively an increase in liver tumors in rodent strains that are characterized by a substantial background incidence of such tumors. These chemicals have not been demonstrated to have the DNA damaging capability of genotoxic carcinogens and several enhance the hepatocarcinogenicity of previously administered liver carcinogens. Moreover, they exert an inhibition of intercellular communication. Thus, carcinogens of this type may be epigenetic carcinogens functioning as liver tumor promoters. Accordingly, the health risk analysis for these chemicals is different from that for genotoxic carcinogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6873012      PMCID: PMC1569227          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8350177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  43 in total

1.  Fate of teratocarcinoma cells injected into early mouse embryos.

Authors:  V E Papaioannou; M W McBurney; R L Gardner; M J Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Induction of cell division: role of cell membrane sites.

Authors:  A Sivak
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 6.384

3.  The stimulation of phospholipid metabolism in mouse skin following phorbol ester treatment.

Authors:  L R Rohrschneider; D H O'Brien; R K Boutwell
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1972-09-07

4.  Differentiation in a transplantable rat tumour maintained in organ culture.

Authors:  M L Ellison; E J Ambrose; G C Easty
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Transplantation of nuclei from the frog renal adenocarcinoma. I. Development of tumor nuclear-transplant embryos.

Authors:  T J King; M A DiBerardino
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1965-08-10       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Induction of liver tumor in Sherman strain female rats by polychlorinated biphenyl aroclor 1260.

Authors:  R D Kimbrough; R A Squire; R E Linder; J D Strandberg; R J Montalli; V W Burse
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Alteration by phenobarbital of membrane-associated enzymes including gamma glutamyl transpeptidase in mouse liver neoplasms.

Authors:  G M Williams; T Ohmori; S Katayama; J M Rice
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Embryonic inductive tissues that cause histologic differentiation of murine mammary carcinoma in vitro.

Authors:  J J DeCosse; C Gossens; J F Kuzma; B R Unsworth
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The effect of aging and interval between primary and secondary treatment in two-stage carcinogenesis on mouse skin.

Authors:  B L Van Duuren; A Sivak; C Katz; I Seidman; S Melchionne
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Normal genetically mosaic mice produced from malignant teratocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  B Mintz; K Illmensee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Characterization of a rat liver epithelial cell line to detect inhibitors of metabolic cooperation.

Authors:  C Jone; J E Trosko; C C Chang
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1987-03

2.  A flow cytometric comparison of DNA content and glutathione levels in hepatocytes of English sole (Parophyrs vetulus) from areas of differing water quality.

Authors:  N K Jenner; G K Ostrander; T J Kavanagh; J C Livesey; M W Shen; S C Kim; E H Holmes
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Liver carcinogenesis: from naughty chemicals to soothing fat and the surprising role of NRF2.

Authors:  Michael Karin; Debanjan Dhar
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Proliferative lesions of the glandular stomach and liver in F344 rats fed diets containing Aroclor 1254.

Authors:  J M Ward
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.