Literature DB >> 6872415

Bumetanide and furosemide.

D C Brater, P Chennavasin, B Day, A Burdette, S Anderson.   

Abstract

We assessed the response to and handling of furosemide and bumetanide in 30 experiments with the former and 46 with the latter in normal subjects. Oral doses of furosemide (20, 40, and 80 mg) were used, and subjects received oral doses of 0.5, 1, and 2 mg bumetanide and intravenous doses of 0.5 and 1 mg bumetanide. both drugs were quickly absorbed and peak urinary amounts were reached at 75 min (median). Approximately 30% of an oral dose of each drug was excreted unchanged in the urine with no evidence of dose-dependent elimination. After intravenous injection, 36% of the bumetanide was excreted unchanged. Consequently, bumetanide has an estimated bioavailability of 80% (approximately 40% for furosemide). The relationship between the logarithm of the urinary bumetanide excretion rate and the logarithm of the sodium excretion rate was described by a sigmoid-shaped dose-response curve, with a dose inducing half-maximal response of 1 +/- 0.04 micrograms/min; it was 69.8 micrograms/min for furosemide. Overall, the distinguishing features between the two drugs are the 200% greater bioavailability and the much greater potency of bumetanide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6872415     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1983.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  19 in total

1.  Concentration-effect and dose-response relations in clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Effect of chronic oral furosemide administration on the 24-hour cycle of lithium clearance and electrolyte excretion in humans.

Authors:  M Shalmi; H Rasmusen; O Amtorp; S Christensen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics in heart failure. An updated review.

Authors:  F V Shammas; K Dickstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Diuretics. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use (Part I).

Authors:  A Lant
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Diuretic Resistance.

Authors:  Ewout J Hoorn; David H Ellison
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Renal tubular resistance is the primary driver for loop diuretic resistance in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Jozine M Ter Maaten; Veena S Rao; Jennifer S Hanberg; F Perry Wilson; Lavanya Bellumkonda; Mahlet Assefa; J Sam Broughton; Julie D'Ambrosi; W H Wilson Tang; Kevin Damman; Adriaan A Voors; David H Ellison; Jeffrey M Testani
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacology of loop diuretics.

Authors:  D C Brater
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Furosemide responsiveness, non-adherence and resistance during the chronic treatment of heart failure: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Robert J MacFadyen; J Christopher Gorski; D Craig Brater; Allan D Struthers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bumetanide after intravenous and oral administration to rats: absorption from various GI segments.

Authors:  S H Lee; M G Lee; N D Kim
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-02

10.  Effects of the rate and composition of fluid replacement on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous furosemide.

Authors:  T Li; M G Lee; W L Chiou
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1986-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.