Literature DB >> 6867259

High-frequency hearing loss in male farmers of Missouri.

J W Thelin, D J Joseph, W E Davis, D E Baker, M C Hosokawa.   

Abstract

Farmers are exposed to noise that is potentially hazardous to hearing. We measured the hearing of 161 male farmers and 75 male nonfarmers at the 1979 Missouri Farmers Association Agri-Fair and compared it with the hearing of 129 office workers from central Missouri. Fixed-level screening tests were conducted in both ears at three stimulus frequencies: 1000 and 2000 hertz at 20 decibels hearing level and 4000 hertz at 25 decibels hearing level. Audiometers were calibrated in accordance with the ANSI-1969 standard. The results show that farmers are at risk for hearing loss at 2000 and 4000 hertz when compared with office workers. The prevalence of hearing loss was greater for farmers at both frequencies in every decade age group from 25 to 64 years. Using screening failure at 2000 and 4000 hertz in both ears as a criterion for a loss that would affect communication ability, we found that the failure rate was 16.8 percent for farmers and 6.2 percent for office workers. As other investigators have found, the prevalence of high-frequency hearing loss in male nonfarmers who associate with farmers was nearly as great as for farmers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6867259      PMCID: PMC1424436     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  4 in total

1.  Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds. Survey of hearing levels from 18 to 65 years.

Authors:  J F CORSO
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1963-04

2.  Hearing loss as a function of age.

Authors:  A GLORIG; J NIXON
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  The effect of tractor noise on the auditory sensitivity of tractor operators.

Authors:  D M LIERLE; S N REGER
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1958-06       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  The presbycusis component in occupational hearing loss.

Authors:  C P Lebo; R C Reddell
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 3.325

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Occupational hazards of farming.

Authors:  G White; A Cessna
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Hearing loss among high school farm students.

Authors:  S K Broste; D A Hansen; R L Strand; D T Stueland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  A Hearing Loss Prevention Outreach Program for Farmers and Motorsports Enthusiasts.

Authors:  Melanie Buhr-Lawler
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-05

4.  Hearing sensitivity in farmers.

Authors:  R S Karlovich; T L Wiley; T Tweed; D V Jensen
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Occupational hearing loss in farmers.

Authors:  B L Plakke; E Dare
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Effects of interventions on use of hearing protectors among farm operators: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; Tanima Banerjee; Michael A Cohen; James J Yang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of hearing protection interventions for farm operators.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; David L Ronis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; Tanima Banerjee; James J Yang; Janice Bernick; Sonia Duffy; Richard Redman
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.