Literature DB >> 6865263

Ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the morphologic diagnosis of pancreatic disease.

W Swobodnik, W Meyer, D Brecht-Kraus, J G Wechsler, S Geiger, P Malfertheiner, U Junge, H Ditschuneit.   

Abstract

From February to November 1981 the diagnostic relevance of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was compared prospectively in 75 patients with suspected pancreatic disease. Final diagnosis was confirmed by autopsy, surgery, clinical course, and further laboratory data. Thus it was possible to exclude pancreatic disorders in 32 patients. By ERCP we diagnosed all tumors; sensitivity was 100%. Sensitivity of US and CT were 63% each. In five cases US made the false positive diagnosis" pancreatic malignant tumor" (specificity 93%), CT and ERCP in two cases (specificity 97% each). In chronic pancreatitis specificity of US and ERCP were 100% and specificity of CT was 98%. Sensitivity of ERCP amounted to 93%, CT and US revealed 74% and 52%, respectively. We conclude that ERCP is the best morphologic diagnostic tool in differentiating chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma. US is a good screening method and CT reveals good diagnostic results in acute pancreatitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6865263     DOI: 10.1007/bf01497778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0023-2173


  50 in total

Review 1.  ERCP.

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Comparison of ultrasound and computer-assisted tomography in pancreatic diagnosis.

Authors:  J E Husband; H B Meire; L Kreel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  [Pancreatic sonography in undefined upper abdominal symptoms (author's transl)].

Authors:  L Huck; P Knop; T U Hausamen
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1981-01-16       Impact factor: 0.628

4.  [Roentgen diagnosis of the pancreas].

Authors:  E Bücheler; F U Montgomery; E Grabbe
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Appearance of normal pancreatic duct: a study using real-time ultrasound.

Authors:  P J Bryan
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 0.910

6.  Computed tomography of the pancreas.

Authors:  J R Haaga; R J Alfidi; M G Zelch; T F Meany; M Boller; L Gonzalez; G L Jelden
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Sensitivity of pancreatic ultrasonography in the detection of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  T L Lawson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  CT scanning and ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic pseudocysts: a preliminary comparison.

Authors:  H Y Kressel; A R Margulis; G W Gooding; R A Filly; A Moss; M Korobkin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Complementary use of ultrasound and computed tomography in studies of the pancreas and kidney.

Authors:  R G Levitt; G G Geisse; S S Sagel; R J Stanley; R G Evens; R E Koehler; R G Jost
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  [A critical comparison of methods for diagnosing carcinoma of the pancreas (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Ariyama; H Shirakabe; S Shimaguchi; J Autenrieth
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1980-07
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasonography in diagnosing chronic pancreatitis: new aspects.

Authors:  Georg Dimcevski; Friedemann G Erchinger; Roald Havre; Odd Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

3.  Retrospective audit of the value of the pancreolauryl test in a district general hospital.

Authors:  I A Murray; S Clenton; B A McGeorge; A F Safe
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Comparison of pancreatic morphology and exocrine functional impairment in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  T Bozkurt; U Braun; S Leferink; G Gilly; G Lux
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Issa; M A Kempeneers; H C van Santvoort; T L Bollen; S Bipat; M A Boermeester
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.