Literature DB >> 6864521

Antibiotic efficacy against Vibrio vulnificus in the mouse: superiority of tetracycline.

J H Bowdre, J H Hull, D M Cocchetto.   

Abstract

Seven antimicrobial agents, all effective against Vibrio vulnificus in vitro, were compared for in vivo efficacy in mice experimentally infected with V. vulnificus strain B3547. Mice were injected s.c. with 1 X 10(8) cells, and i.p. injection of antimicrobials was begun 1.5 hr later when mice were bacteremic and had edematous lesions at the injection site. The study was done in two phases. Phase I was a dose-ranging experiment, using single injections within the range (on a body weight-adjusted basis) clinically useful in humans. Of 12 mice treated with tetracycline (4 mg/kg), 12 survived at 24 hr, compared to 0 of 21 saline-treated controls, 3 of 10 given ampicillin (32 mg/kg) and 2 of 3 given cefotaxime (20 mg/kg). There were no survivors at 24 hr in groups of 5 to 10 mice treated with cefazolin (32 mg/kg), carbenicillin (80 mg/kg), erythromycin (8 mg/kg) or gentamicin (8 mg/kg). Phase II was designed to simulate clinical conditions using multiple dosing for 30 hr and scoring for survival at 96 hr. Of 12 mice given tetracycline (3 mg/kg every 12 hr), 12 survived, compared to 1 of 10 given cefotaxime (20 mg/kg every 6 hr), 0 of 12 given carbenicillin (40 mg/kg every 6 hr) and 0 of 12 given saline every 6 hr. Tetracycline thus appears to be the agent of choice among those tested for in vivo efficacy against V. vulnificus in the mouse model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6864521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  21 in total

Review 1.  Vibrio vulnificus: disease and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Melissa K Jones; James D Oliver
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Necrotizing wound infection from a tilapia fish injury.

Authors:  Raistlin Alexander Majere; Sandra Cortina
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Quantitative PCR and in vivo efficacy of antibiotics in the treatment of Vibrio vulnificus infection in a mouse model.

Authors:  G P Neupane; D-M Kim; N R Yun; S-H Shin; S-C Lim; C-H Choi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  In vitro efficacy of the combination of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime against Vibrio vulnificus.

Authors:  Dong-Min Kim; Yong Lym; Sook Jin Jang; Hulin Han; Young Gi Kim; Choon-Hae Chung; Soon Pyo Hong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In vitro and in vivo activities of newer fluoroquinolones against Vibrio vulnificus.

Authors:  Hung-Jen Tang; Ming-Chung Chang; Wen-Chien Ko; Kun-Yen Huang; Chih-Lung Lee; Yin-Ching Chuang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Direct identification of Vibrio vulnificus in clinical specimens by nested PCR.

Authors:  S E Lee; S Y Kim; S J Kim; H S Kim; J H Shin; S H Choi; S S Chung; J H Rhee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Vibrio vulnificus bacteriophage SSP002 as a possible biocontrol agent.

Authors:  Hyun Sung Lee; Slae Choi; Hakdong Shin; Ju-Hoon Lee; Sang Ho Choi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Infections caused by halophilic marine Vibrio bacteria.

Authors:  R J Howard; N T Bennett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Minocycline and cefotaxime in the treatment of experimental murine Vibrio vulnificus infection.

Authors:  Y C Chuang; W C Ko; S T Wang; J W Liu; C F Kuo; J J Wu; K Y Huang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Vibrio vulnificus. Hazard on the half shell.

Authors:  K L Koenig; J Mueller; T Rose
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.