Literature DB >> 686354

[Comparative studies of the local anaesthetic action of carticaine 1% and mepivacaine 1% (author's transl)].

S Sommer, H Fruhstorfer, H Nolte.   

Abstract

The actions of carticaine 1% and mepivacaine 1% in peripheral nerve block were investigated in double-blind study. Bilateral ulnar nerve blocks were performed in 14 healthy subjects (age range 20-30 years), and latency, duration, and intensity of anaesthesia were quantitatively determined. There were no differences in latency of nerve block, but a significant difference in the duration of effect: Mepivacaine acted for nearly twice as long as Carticaine. In addition, several incomplete blocks were noted with Carticaine. On the basis of these results mepivacaine is preferred in peripheral nerve block because of its longer and more reliable action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 686354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  3 in total

1.  Comparative study on anesthetic potency of dental local anesthetics assessed by the jaw-opening reflex in rabbits.

Authors:  T Miyoshi; H Aida; Y Kaneko
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2000

2.  Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches.

Authors:  D A Haas; D G Harper; M A Saso; E R Young
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

3.  Evaluation of the anesthetic effect of epinephrine-free articaine and mepivacaine through quantitative sensory testing.

Authors:  Sareh Said Yekta-Michael; Jamal M Stein; Ernst Marioth-Wirtz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.151

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.