Literature DB >> 6863099

Cardiorespiratory responses to exercise distributed between the upper and lower body.

M M Toner, M N Sawka, L Levine, K B Pandolf.   

Abstract

The present study examined the influence that distributing exercise between upper (arm crank exercise) and lower (cycle exercise) body muscle groups had on cardiorespiratory responses to constant power output (PO) exercise. Six male volunteers completed five submaximal exercise bouts of 7-min duration at both 76 and 109 W. The arm PO/total PO (% arm) for these bouts was approximately 0, 20, 40, 60, and 100%. At 76 W, O2 uptake (VO2) did not change (P greater than 0.05) from 0 to approximately 20% arm (approximately 1.30 1 x min-1) but increased with increasing percent arm values up to 100% (1.58 1 x min-1). At 109 W, VO2 increased throughout the range of 0 (1.70 1 x min-1) to 100% arm (2.33 1 x min-1). In general, minute ventilation (VE) and respiratory exchange ratio (R) increased with increased percent arm values at 76 and 109 W. The heart rate (HR) responses remained unchanged from 0 to 60% arm at both 76 and 109 W; however, between 60 and 100% arm, a 26-beats x min-1 increase was observed at 76 W (143 beats x min-1 at 100% arm) and a 45-beats x min-1 increase at 109 W (174 beats x min-1 at 100% arm). These data suggested that during upper body exercise, the increased VO2 associated with increased percent arm values was not accompanied by an elevated HR response when at least 40% of the PO was performed by the lower body. This might be attributed to a facilitated venous return and/or a decreased total peripheral resistance when the lower body was involved in the exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6863099     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.5.1403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol        ISSN: 0161-7567


  10 in total

Review 1.  Physiological effects of exercising with handweights.

Authors:  T E Auble; L Schwartz
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effect of exercise mode on heart rate variability during steady state exercise.

Authors:  Anthony S Leicht; Wade H Sinclair; Warwick L Spinks
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Does the amount of exercising muscle alter the aerobic demand of dynamic exercise?

Authors:  M D Hoffman; K M Kassay; A I Zeni; P S Clifford
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

4.  Hemodynamic and lactic Acid responses to proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercise.

Authors:  Zuhal Gültekin; Ayse Kin-Isler; Ozgür Sürenkök
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Cardiovascular effects of static and dynamic exercise.

Authors:  J H Chapman; P W Elliott
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988

6.  A comparison of practical assessment methods to determine treadmill, cycle, and elliptical ergometer VO2 peak.

Authors:  Ryan J Mays; Nicholas F Boér; Lisa M Mealey; Kevin H Kim; Fredric L Goss
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Thermoregulatory responses to upper body exercise.

Authors:  M N Sawka; N A Pimental; K B Pandolf
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1984

8.  Is Age-Predicted Maximal Heart Rate Applicable in Patients With Heart or Lung Disease?

Authors:  Sang Hun Han; Min Soo Choi; Young Mo Kim; Dong Min Kim; Ho Eun Park; Ji Won Hong; Sang Hun Kim; Yong Beom Shin; Byeong Ju Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-06-30

9.  Ventilatory responses during arm and leg exercise at varying speeds and forces in untrained female humans.

Authors:  N Takano
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Stability Ball Sitting versus Chair Sitting During Sub-maximal Arm Ergometry.

Authors:  Charles R C Marks; Kristina E Hylland; Jacob Terrell
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2012-01-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.