Literature DB >> 686189

Response of cultured myocardial cells to countershock-type electric field stimulation.

J L Jones, E Lepeschkin, R E Jones, S Rush.   

Abstract

Myocardial cells isolated from 8-day chick embryos were grown in monolayer culture under conditions that produce "standard embryonic" and "adult-type" cells. These cells were subjected to electric field stimulation that had a waveshape and intensities similar to those used in clinical electric countershock procedures. Photocell mechanograms obtained before, during, and after stimulation were correlated with simultaneously measured transmembrane potentials to determine the relationship between membrane polarization and arrhythmia production that occured after the stimulus. The results of these experiments demonstrate that a predictable sequence of mechanical responses occurs after stimuli ranging in intensity from 6 to 200 V/cm. This sequence, which closely resembles that observed in vivo after similar stimulation intensities, consists of a single response (activation), tachyarrhythmia, relaxed arrest followed by transient tachyarrhythmia, arrest with contracture, and cellular fibrillation. This diverse pattern of arrhythmias is associated with a prolonged depolarization of the cell membrane which increases with the intensity of the applied stimulus. It is probable that this depolarization is caused by a transient electromechanical deformation of the cell membrane during the shock. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the causes of the arrhythmias that appear after clinical and experimental electric countershock procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 686189     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1978.235.2.H214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  12 in total

1.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. II. Effects Of ionic concentrations.

Authors:  K A DeBruin; W Krassowska
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. I. Effects Of field strength and rest potential.

Authors:  K A DeBruin; W Krassowska
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Electroporation-induced inward current in voltage-clamped guinea pig ventricular myocytes.

Authors:  Oksana Dyachok; Pavel Zhabyeyev; Terence F McDonald
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Cell-attached patch clamp study of the electropermeabilization of amphibian cardiac cells.

Authors:  R J O'Neill; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  [Adriamycin-cardiomyopathy induced by an increment of (Ca2+) (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Bühner; S Biedert; D Miura
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1980-07-15

6.  Hyperpolarization and lysophosphatidylcholine induce inward currents and ethidium fluorescence in rabbit ventricular myocytes.

Authors:  Y-M Song; R Ochi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.

Authors:  B B Lerman; H R Halperin; J E Tsitlik; K Brin; C W Clark; O C Deale
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

9.  [Influence of waveform and configuration of electrodes on the defibrillation threshold of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators].

Authors:  M Block; D Hammel; G Breithardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

10.  Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.

Authors:  R A Province; M G Fishler; N V Thakor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.