Literature DB >> 6854350

Distribution of scalp somatosensory potentials evoked by stimulation of the tibial nerve in man.

A Berić, T S Prevec.   

Abstract

The scalp distribution of the response to stimulation of the tibial nerve at the medial malleolus was systematically analysed. The somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) was recorded with electrodes placed in a transversal line over the ipsilateral and contralateral postcentral gyri and in a sagittal line over the longitudinal brain fissure. The SEPs recorded over the ipsilateral hemisphere and along the sagittal line were similar to the F response (the response over the foot primary somatosensory region). Over the contralateral hemisphere the waveform of the responses changed obviously from point F to the point C (contralateral hand primary somatosensory region). The C response started with N37, P40 had a longer latency, N50 was not present and the subsequent waves were also considerably different. Mathematical simulation of the responses recorded from the electrodes between points F and C has shown that they represent an electrical algebraic summation of the activity over points F and C. Although the F and C responses may be 2 potentials arising from the opposite sides of a single dipole generator which is located in the medial fissure, it is more probable that the somatosensory evoked potential on tibial nerve stimulation reflects the activity of 2 separate generators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6854350     DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(83)90038-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the dermatomal somatosensory evoked potential in the diagnosis of lumbo-sacral root compression.

Authors:  H A Katifi; E M Sedgwick
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation attenuates somatosensory evoked potentials from the lower limb.

Authors:  Christopher M Zapallow; Michael J Asmussen; David A E Bolton; Kevin G H Lee; Mark F Jacobs; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.288

3.  SEP Montage Variability Comparison during Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.

Authors:  Christine Hanson; Athena Maria Lolis; Aleksandar Beric
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.