Literature DB >> 6853843

Relationships between vocal intensity and noninvasively obtained aerodynamic parameters in normal subjects.

S Tanaka, W J Gould.   

Abstract

The relationships between vocal intensity (sound pressure level) and intrapulmonic pressure, mean flow rate, and aerodynamic powere were investigated in ten normal subjects. The intrapulmonic pressure was measured noninvasively and simultaneously with sound pressure level and mean flow rate during sustained phonation of the vowel/a/by means of plethysmographic and pneumotachographic methods. The aerodynamic power was calculated as intrapulmonic pressure times mean flow rate. The averaged values for the normal subjects represented (sound power) alpha (intrapulmonic pressure), (sound power) alpha (mean flow rate), and (sound power) alpha (aerodynamic power), where sound power at the open end of the pneumotachograph was estimated from sound pressure level. Vocal efficiency was defined as the ratio of sound power to aerodynamic power. Individual variation of coal efficiency (in dB) was satisfactorily small in the normal subjects, and was determined by the simple addition of individual variations of intrapulmonic pressure and mean flow rate (in dB) from the averaged values. These findings strongly suggested that the comparison of those three measurements against normative data for normal subjects such as provided by this study is useful in evaluating and clarifying the ineffective voice production of the pathological larynx.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6853843     DOI: 10.1121/1.389235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Cause-effect relationship between vocal fold physiology and voice production in a three-dimensional phonation model.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Regulation of glottal closure and airflow in a three-dimensional phonation model: implications for vocal intensity control.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The Relationship Between Physiological Mechanisms and the Self-Perception of Vocal Effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Manuel E Diaz-Cadiz; Adrianna C Shembel; Nicole M Enos; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  LaDIVA: A neurocomputational model providing laryngeal motor control for speech acquisition and production.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Gabriel A Alzamendi; Gabriel J Cler; Frank H Guenther; Cara E Stepp; Matías Zañartu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  Improved subglottal pressure estimation from neck-surface vibration in healthy speakers producing non-modal phonation.

Authors:  Jon Z Lin; Víctor M Espinoza; Katherine L Marks; Matías Zañartu; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 6.856

6.  Effect of cues to increase sound pressure level on respiratory kinematic patterns during connected speech.

Authors:  Jessica E Huber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Estimating Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration During Normal Voice Production.

Authors:  Amanda S Fryd; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Magnitude of Neck-Surface Vibration as an Estimate of Subglottal Pressure During Modulations of Vocal Effort and Intensity in Healthy Speakers.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Andres F Llico; Daryush D Mehta; Joseph S Perkell; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Quantitative Assessment of Learning and Retention in Virtual Vocal Function Exercises.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Se-Woong Park; Matthew Jarvis; Joseph Stemple; Robert E Hillman; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.297

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.