Literature DB >> 6853111

Comparison of three methods for rapid determination of threshold contrast sensitivity.

A P Ginsburg, M W Cannon.   

Abstract

Threshold contrast sensitivity functions for 13 subjects were determined on 5 consecutive days using three psychophysical methods. Each method was implemented on a microprocessor controlled display system and considered as a possible candidate for a rapid visual screening test. The methods used were Bekesy tracking, method of adjustment, and method of increasing contrast. The method of increasing contrast proved superior to the other methods in repeatability, speed, and the preservation of individual differences in contrast sensitivity over the testing period.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6853111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of three clinical methods of spatial contrast-sensitivity testing in normal subjects.

Authors:  S Tweten; M Wall; B D Schwartz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Radial keratotomy and glare effects on contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  A Atkin; P Asbell; N Justin; H Smith; R Wayne; J Winterkorn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-02-28       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Contrast sensitivity after resolution of central serous retinopathy.

Authors:  P Koskela; L Laatikainen; K von Dickhoff
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  A purely central movement aftereffect induced by binocular viewing of dynamic visual noise.

Authors:  Y Y Zeevi; G A Geri
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-11

5.  Spatial and spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of normal and glaucoma eyes.

Authors:  M Korth; F Horn; B Storck; J B Jonas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Visual dysfunction in patients with mitochondrial myopathies. II. Contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  G Ambrosio; U Giani; L Loffredo; R De Marco; P Vastarella
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Contrast sensitivity versus visual acuity in retinal disease.

Authors:  M F Marmor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.638

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.