Literature DB >> 6847915

Light and electron microscopic studies of phrenic nerves after long-term electrical stimulation.

J H Kim, E E Manuelidis, W W Glenn, Y Fukuda, D S Cole, J F Hogan.   

Abstract

Light and electron microscopic evaluation were carried out on canine phrenic nerves subjected to long-term electrical stimulation. A total of 34 stimulated and 19 control nerves were studied by light microscopy, and 10 stimulated and five control nerves were evaluated by electron microscopy. Except in a few cases in which a higher current was used, the current used for stimulation was between 1 and 2 mA. The pulse width was 150 microseconds. The typical charge per pulse was 0.22 microC and charge density per pulse 1.125 microC/sq cm of real area. The total number of days of electrical stimulation in individual phrenic nerves ranged from 4 to 374. No morphological changes in the phrenic nerve that could be attributed to the electrical stimulation were observed by light or electron microscopic study. There were, however, two phrenic nerves cuffed with bipolar electrodes which showed focal demyelination at the electrode level, but these changes were caused by factors other than the electrical stimulation. The results of the studies have direct clinical implications to long-term stimulation of phrenic nerves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6847915     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1983.58.1.0084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  4 in total

1.  Neural morphological effects of long-term implantation of the self-sizing spiral cuff nerve electrode.

Authors:  E Romero; J F Denef; J Delbeke; A Robert; C Veraart
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Long-term implantation of platinum electrodes: effects on electrode material and nerve tissue.

Authors:  A Jonzon; E N Larsson; P A Oberg; G Sedin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Histologic and physiologic evaluation of electrically stimulated peripheral nerve: considerations for the selection of parameters.

Authors:  W F Agnew; D B McCreery; T G Yuen; L A Bullara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Safety of long-term electrical peripheral nerve stimulation: review of the state of the art.

Authors:  Clara Günter; Jean Delbeke; Max Ortiz-Catalan
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.