Literature DB >> 6846434

Cervical cerclage: an aggressive approach to threatened or recurrent pregnancy wastage.

W R Crombleholme, H L Minkoff, I Delke, R H Schwarz.   

Abstract

Patients at high risk for recurrent pregnancy wastage may not always provide a typical history of cervical incompetence. Seventy-five pregnancies were managed with a cervical cerclage, with tocolytic agents used adjunctively in some. The pregnancies were divided into three groups on the basis of past obstetric history and statistically analyzed with respect to outcome. Patients in categories 1 and 2 showed significant improvement in mean birth weight and maximum gestational age attained with a shift in the ratio of term to premature births after intervention. In category 3, a trend of improvement in mean birth weight and maximum gestational age was seen but fetal salvage was not improved. Maternal morbidity was low with a cerclage-related cesarean section rate of 6.8% and only 8% infectious morbidity. It is concluded that cervical cerclage should be considered in the management of recurrent pregnancy wastage even if the obstetric history is atypical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6846434     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91048-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Jimmy Espinoza; Offer Erez; Sonia Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Recurrent preterm birth.

Authors:  Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Roberto Romero; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Beth L Pineles; Francesca Gotsch; Pooja Mittal; Nandor Gabor Than; Jimmy Espinoza; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length.

Authors:  John Owen; Gary Hankins; Jay D Iams; Vincenzo Berghella; Jeanne S Sheffield; Annette Perez-Delboy; Robert S Egerman; Deborah A Wing; Mark Tomlinson; Richard Silver; Susan M Ramin; Edwin R Guzman; Michael Gordon; Helen Y How; Eric J Knudtson; Jeff M Szychowski; Suzanne Cliver; John C Hauth
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.661

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.