Literature DB >> 6844027

Sources of variation in analgesic responses in cancer patients with chronic pain receiving morphine.

R F Kaiko, S L Wallenstein, A G Rogers, R W Houde.   

Abstract

Our objective was to identify and quantify sources of variation in the relief of chronic pain with morphine. Relief scores were extracted from records obtained during controlled trials of analgesics in cancer patients with chronic pain in which intramuscular morphine was the assay standard. Relief data from 715 patients after 565 8-mg and 538 16-mg doses were segregated according to age, race, sex, pre-drug pain intensity, character and site. Middle-aged patients obtained relief after 8 mg comparable to relief obtained by younger patients after 16 mg; oldest patients obtained relief after 8 mg comparable to relief obtained by middle-aged patients after 16 mg. Blacks receiving 8 mg obtained relief comparable to whites receiving 16 mg. Sex-related differences were not significant. Patients with moderate, as compared to severe, pre-drug pain obtained significantly greater relief only after 16 mg. Patients reporting dull pain obtained relief after 8 mg comparable to relief obtained with sharp pain after 16 mg. Patients with abdominal pain obtained relief after 8 mg comparable to relief of pain in the chest or arms after 16 mg. These results provide dose-related evidence of variation in relief with morphine in chronic cancer pain and establish particular patient and pain characteristics as variables for which controls should be provided in analgesic assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6844027     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90018-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  12 in total

1.  Irrational attitudes toward addicts and narcotics.

Authors:  S W Perry
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1985-10

2.  Individual differences in morphine and butorphanol analgesia: a laboratory pain study.

Authors:  Kimberly T Sibille; Lindsay L Kindler; Toni L Glover; Ricardo D Gonzalez; Roland Staud; Joseph L Riley; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 3.  The management of pain.

Authors:  L Lasagna
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Ethnic differences in pain and pain management.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2012-05

5.  Sex differences in micro-opioid receptor expression in the rat midbrain periaqueductal gray are essential for eliciting sex differences in morphine analgesia.

Authors:  Dayna R Loyd; Xioaya Wang; Anne Z Murphy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Drug management of pain in cancer patients.

Authors:  C B Tuttle
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Individual differences in human opioid abuse potential as observed in a human laboratory study.

Authors:  Kelly E Dunn; Frederick S Barrett; Bruna Brands; David C Marsh; George E Bigelow
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Contribution of Endogenous Spinal Endomorphin 2 to Intrathecal Opioid Antinociception in Rats Is Agonist Dependent and Sexually Dimorphic.

Authors:  Arjun Kumar; Nai-Jiang Liu; Priyanka A Madia; Alan R Gintzler
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 9.  Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Roger B Fillingim; Christopher D King; Margarete C Ribeiro-Dasilva; Bridgett Rahim-Williams; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 10.  Pain--mechanics and management.

Authors:  H L Fields; J D Levine
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1984-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.